These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

218 related items for PubMed ID: 29954332

  • 1. Comparison of AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring approaches in predicting the risk of in-hospital death among emergency hospitalized patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective observational study in Nanjing, China.
    Gu L, Xu F, Yuan J.
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2018 Jun 28; 18(1):98. PubMed ID: 29954332
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems for the prediction of the risk of in-hospital death among patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Lu X, Zhang X, Chen H.
    Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2020 Jun 28; 112(6):467-473. PubMed ID: 32379473
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Prospective Comparison of the AIMS65 Score, Glasgow-Blatchford Score, and Rockall Score for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Variceal and Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
    Chang A, Ouejiaraphant C, Akarapatima K, Rattanasupa A, Prachayakul V.
    Clin Endosc; 2021 Mar 28; 54(2):211-221. PubMed ID: 32668528
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Risk stratification in acute upper GI bleeding: comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems.
    Robertson M, Majumdar A, Boyapati R, Chung W, Worland T, Terbah R, Wei J, Lontos S, Angus P, Vaughan R.
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jun 28; 83(6):1151-60. PubMed ID: 26515955
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. AIMS65 scoring system is comparable to Glasgow-Blatchford score or Rockall score for prediction of clinical outcomes for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Kim MS, Choi J, Shin WC.
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2019 Jul 26; 19(1):136. PubMed ID: 31349816
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Scoring systems used to predict mortality in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the ED.
    Tang Y, Shen J, Zhang F, Zhou X, Tang Z, You T.
    Am J Emerg Med; 2018 Jan 26; 36(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 28673695
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of various prognostic scores in variceal and non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A prospective cohort study.
    Rout G, Sharma S, Gunjan D, Kedia S, Nayak B, Shalimar.
    Indian J Gastroenterol; 2019 Apr 26; 38(2):158-166. PubMed ID: 30830583
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of three risk scores to predict outcomes in upper gastrointestinal bleeding; modifying Glasgow-Blatchford with albumin.
    Shafaghi A, Gharibpoor F, Mahdipour Z, Samadani AA.
    Rom J Intern Med; 2019 Dec 01; 57(4):322-333. PubMed ID: 31268861
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score and modified Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score in predicting outcomes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: An accuracy and calibration study.
    Akhila Arya PV, Thulaseedharan NK, Raj R, Unnikrishnan DC, Jacob A.
    Indian J Gastroenterol; 2023 Aug 01; 42(4):496-504. PubMed ID: 37382854
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study.
    Stanley AJ, Laine L, Dalton HR, Ngu JH, Schultz M, Abazi R, Zakko L, Thornton S, Wilkinson K, Khor CJ, Murray IA, Laursen SB, International Gastrointestinal Bleeding Consortium.
    BMJ; 2017 Jan 04; 356():i6432. PubMed ID: 28053181
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. External validation and comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford score, modified Glasgow-Blatchford score, Rockall score and AIMS65 score in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a cross-sectional observational study in Western Switzerland.
    Rivieri S, Carron PN, Schoepfer A, Ageron FX.
    Eur J Emerg Med; 2023 Feb 01; 30(1):32-39. PubMed ID: 36542335
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and AIMS65 scoring systems for risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department.
    Yaka E, Yılmaz S, Doğan NÖ, Pekdemir M.
    Acad Emerg Med; 2015 Jan 01; 22(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 25556538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Validation of a new risk score system for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Kim MS, Moon HS, Kwon IS, Park JH, Kim JS, Kang SH, Sung JK, Lee ES, Kim SH, Lee BS, Jeong HY.
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Jun 17; 20(1):193. PubMed ID: 32552662
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of three scoring systems for risk stratification in elderly patients wıth acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Kalkan Ç, Soykan I, Karakaya F, Tüzün A, Gençtürk ZB.
    Geriatr Gerontol Int; 2017 Apr 17; 17(4):575-583. PubMed ID: 27075860
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Risk stratification in acute variceal bleeding: Comparison of the AIMS65 score to established upper gastrointestinal bleeding and liver disease severity risk stratification scoring systems in predicting mortality and rebleeding.
    Robertson M, Ng J, Abu Shawish W, Swaine A, Skardoon G, Huynh A, Deshpande S, Low ZY, Sievert W, Angus P.
    Dig Endosc; 2020 Jul 17; 32(5):761-768. PubMed ID: 31863515
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Prospective comparison of three risk scoring systems in non-variceal and variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Thanapirom K, Ridtitid W, Rerknimitr R, Thungsuk R, Noophun P, Wongjitrat C, Luangjaru S, Vedkijkul P, Lertkupinit C, Poonsab S, Ratanachu-ek T, Hansomburana P, Pornthisarn B, Thongbai T, Mahachai V, Treeprasertsuk S.
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2016 Apr 17; 31(4):761-7. PubMed ID: 26514879
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of risk scoring systems for upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients after renal transplantation: a retrospective observational study in Hunan, China.
    Wang R, Wang Q.
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2022 Jul 25; 22(1):353. PubMed ID: 35879668
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of AIMS65 Score and Other Scoring Systems for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Koreans with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
    Park SM, Yeum SC, Kim BW, Kim JS, Kim JH, Sim EH, Ji JS, Choi H.
    Gut Liver; 2016 Jul 15; 10(4):526-31. PubMed ID: 27377742
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of Glasgow-Blatchford Score and Rockall Score in Patients with Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
    Custovic N, Husic-Selimovic A, Srsen N, Prohic D.
    Med Arch; 2020 Aug 15; 74(4):270-274. PubMed ID: 33041443
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Evaluation of scoring systems without endoscopic findings for predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Ko IG, Kim SE, Chang BS, Kwak MS, Yoon JY, Cha JM, Shin HP, Lee JI, Kim SH, Han JH, Jeon JW.
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2017 Dec 12; 17(1):159. PubMed ID: 29233096
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.