These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Exposures to conducted electrical weapons (including TASER® devices): how many and for how long are acceptable? Jauchem JR. J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jan; 60 Suppl 1():S116-29. PubMed ID: 25443856 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. TASER® conducted electrical weapons: misconceptions in the scientific/medical and other literature. Jauchem JR. Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2015 Mar 01; 11(1):53-64. PubMed ID: 25549958 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. 40-Hz square-wave stimulation requires less energy to produce muscle contraction: compared with the TASER® X26 conducted energy weapon. Comeaux JA, Jauchem JR, Cox DD, Crane CC, D'Andrea JA. J Forensic Sci; 2013 Jul 01; 58(4):1026-31. PubMed ID: 23682682 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The physiologic effects of a new generation conducted electrical weapon on human volunteers at rest. Ho JD, Dawes DM, Kunz SN, Klein LR, Driver BE, DeVries PA, Jones GA, Stang JL. Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2020 Sep 01; 16(3):406-414. PubMed ID: 32388670 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. An evaluation of two conducted electrical weapons and two probe designs using a swine comparative cardiac safety model. Dawes DM, Ho JD, Moore JC, Miner JR. Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2013 Sep 01; 9(3):333-42. PubMed ID: 23543462 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]