These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

511 related items for PubMed ID: 29975115

  • 1. Downgrading and Upgrading Gray-Scale Ultrasound BI-RADS Categories of Benign and Malignant Masses With Optoacoustics: A Pilot Study.
    Neuschler EI, Lavin PT, Tucker FL, Barke LD, Bertrand ML, Böhm-Vélez M, Destounis S, Dogan BE, Grobmyer SR, Katzen J, Kist KA, Makariou EV, Parris TM, Young CA, Butler R.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Sep; 211(3):689-700. PubMed ID: 29975115
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Downgrading of Breast Masses Suspicious for Cancer by Using Optoacoustic Breast Imaging.
    Menezes GLG, Pijnappel RM, Meeuwis C, Bisschops R, Veltman J, Lavin PT, van de Vijver MJ, Mann RM.
    Radiology; 2018 Aug; 288(2):355-365. PubMed ID: 29664342
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A Pivotal Study of Optoacoustic Imaging to Diagnose Benign and Malignant Breast Masses: A New Evaluation Tool for Radiologists.
    Neuschler EI, Butler R, Young CA, Barke LD, Bertrand ML, Böhm-Vélez M, Destounis S, Donlan P, Grobmyer SR, Katzen J, Kist KA, Lavin PT, Makariou EV, Parris TM, Schilling KJ, Tucker FL, Dogan BE.
    Radiology; 2018 May; 287(2):398-412. PubMed ID: 29178816
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Optoacoustic Breast Imaging: Imaging-Pathology Correlation of Optoacoustic Features in Benign and Malignant Breast Masses.
    Butler R, Lavin PT, Tucker FL, Barke LD, Böhm-Vélez M, Destounis S, Grobmyer SR, Katzen J, Kist KA, Makariou EV, Schilling KJ, Young CA, Dogan BE, Neuschler EI.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Nov; 211(5):1155-1170. PubMed ID: 30106610
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The Utility of the Fifth Edition of the BI-RADS Ultrasound Lexicon in Category 4 Breast Lesions: A Prospective Multicenter Study in China.
    Gu Y, Tian JW, Ran HT, Ren WD, Chang C, Yuan JJ, Kang CS, Deng YB, Wang H, Luo BM, Guo SL, Zhou Q, Xue ES, Zhan WW, Zhou Q, Li J, Zhou P, Zhang CQ, Chen M, Gu Y, Xu JF, Chen W, Zhang YH, Wang HQ, Li JC, Wang HY, Jiang YX.
    Acad Radiol; 2022 Jan; 29 Suppl 1():S26-S34. PubMed ID: 32768352
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Breast mass characterization using shear wave elastography and ultrasound.
    Hari S, Paul SB, Vidyasagar R, Dhamija E, Adarsh AD, Thulkar S, Mathur S, Sreenivas V, Sharma S, Srivastava A, Seenu V, Prashad R.
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2018 Nov; 99(11):699-707. PubMed ID: 30006125
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Predictive value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and ultrasound elastography for management of BI-RADS category 4 nonpalpable breast masses.
    Niu Q, Zhao L, Wang R, Du L, Shi Q, Jia C, Li G, Jin L, Li F.
    Eur J Radiol; 2024 Apr; 173():111391. PubMed ID: 38422608
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multinational study of 939 masses.
    Berg WA, Cosgrove DO, Doré CJ, Schäfer FK, Svensson WE, Hooley RJ, Ohlinger R, Mendelson EB, Balu-Maestro C, Locatelli M, Tourasse C, Cavanaugh BC, Juhan V, Stavros AT, Tardivon A, Gay J, Henry JP, Cohen-Bacrie C, BE1 Investigators.
    Radiology; 2012 Feb; 262(2):435-49. PubMed ID: 22282182
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy and Efficiency of Categories 4 and 5 of the Second Edition of the BI-RADS Ultrasound Lexicon in Diagnosing Breast Lesions.
    Zou X, Wang J, Lan X, Lin Q, Han F, Liu L, Li A.
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Sep; 42(9):2065-71. PubMed ID: 27262521
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Accuracy of classification of breast ultrasound findings based on criteria used for BI-RADS.
    Heinig J, Witteler R, Schmitz R, Kiesel L, Steinhard J.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 32(4):573-8. PubMed ID: 18421795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Role of BI-RADS Ultrasound Subcategories 4A to 4C in Predicting Breast Cancer.
    Spinelli Varella MA, Teixeira da Cruz J, Rauber A, Varella IS, Fleck JF, Moreira LF.
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2018 Aug; 18(4):e507-e511. PubMed ID: 29066139
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [The value of ultrasound classification in BI-RADS category 4 of breast complex cystic masses].
    Yao JP, Niu LJ, Wang Y, Geng CY, Chang Q, Chen Y, Zhu L.
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2018 Sep 23; 40(9):672-675. PubMed ID: 30293391
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Utilizing size-based thresholds of stiffness gradient to reclassify BI-RADS category 3-4b lesions increases diagnostic performance.
    Shang J, Ruan LT, Wang YY, Zhang XJ, Dang Y, Liu B, Wang WL, Song Y, Chang SJ.
    Clin Radiol; 2019 Apr 23; 74(4):306-313. PubMed ID: 30755314
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Correlation of ultrasound, cytological, and histological features of 110 benign BI-RADS categories 4C and 5 nonpalpable breast lesions. The Institut Curie's experience.
    Farras Roca JA, Tardivon A, Thibault F, Rouzier R, Klijanienko J.
    Cancer Cytopathol; 2021 Jun 23; 129(6):479-488. PubMed ID: 33689204
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Influence of age on PPV of sonographic BI-RADS categories 3, 4, and 5.
    Fu CY, Hsu HH, Yu JC, Hsu GC, Hsu KF, Chan DC, Ku CH, Lu TC, Chu CH.
    Ultraschall Med; 2011 Jan 23; 32 Suppl 1():S8-13. PubMed ID: 20603785
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 26.