These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

454 related items for PubMed ID: 29983145

  • 1. Algorithmic Approach for Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided Stent Implantation During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Shlofmitz E, Shlofmitz RA, Galougahi KK, Rahim HM, Virmani R, Hill JM, Matsumura M, Mintz GS, Maehara A, Landmesser U, Stone GW, Ali ZA.
    Interv Cardiol Clin; 2018 Jul; 7(3):329-344. PubMed ID: 29983145
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Randomized comparison of stent strut coverage following angiography- or optical coherence tomography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Kim JS, Shin DH, Kim BK, Ko YG, Choi D, Jang Y, Hong MK.
    Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed); 2015 Mar; 68(3):190-7. PubMed ID: 25487222
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Optical coherence tomography compared with intravascular ultrasound and with angiography to guide coronary stent implantation (ILUMIEN III: OPTIMIZE PCI): a randomised controlled trial.
    Ali ZA, Maehara A, Généreux P, Shlofmitz RA, Fabbiocchi F, Nazif TM, Guagliumi G, Meraj PM, Alfonso F, Samady H, Akasaka T, Carlson EB, Leesar MA, Matsumura M, Ozan MO, Mintz GS, Ben-Yehuda O, Stone GW, ILUMIEN III: OPTIMIZE PCI Investigators.
    Lancet; 2016 Nov 26; 388(10060):2618-2628. PubMed ID: 27806900
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison between Optical COherence tomography guidance and Angiography guidance in percutaneous coronary intervention (COCOA): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Kubo T, Shinke T, Okamura T, Hibi K, Nakazawa G, Morino Y, Shite J, Ino Y, Kitabata H, Shimokawa T, Akasaka T.
    J Cardiol; 2018 Aug 26; 72(2):170-175. PubMed ID: 29486964
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of optical coherence tomography-guided versus intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: Rationale and design of a randomized, controlled OCTIVUS trial.
    Kang DY, Ahn JM, Park H, Lee PH, Kang SJ, Lee SW, Kim YH, Park SW, Kim SW, Hur SH, Cho YK, Lee CH, Hong SJ, Hong YJ, Yoon YW, Kim SJ, Bae JH, Oh JH, Park DW, Park SJ.
    Am Heart J; 2020 Oct 26; 228():72-80. PubMed ID: 32871327
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of Stent Expansion Guided by Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound: The ILUMIEN II Study (Observational Study of Optical Coherence Tomography [OCT] in Patients Undergoing Fractional Flow Reserve [FFR] and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention).
    Maehara A, Ben-Yehuda O, Ali Z, Wijns W, Bezerra HG, Shite J, Généreux P, Nichols M, Jenkins P, Witzenbichler B, Mintz GS, Stone GW.
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov 26; 8(13):1704-14. PubMed ID: 26585621
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Usefulness of Frequency Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Compared with Intravascular Ultrasound as a Guidance for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Kim IC, Yoon HJ, Shin ES, Kim MS, Park J, Cho YK, Park HS, Kim H, Nam CW, Han SW, Kim YN, Kim KB, Hur SH.
    J Interv Cardiol; 2016 Apr 26; 29(2):216-24. PubMed ID: 26927366
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Intravascular ultrasound versus optical coherence tomography guidance.
    Waksman R, Kitabata H, Prati F, Albertucci M, Mintz GS.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Oct 22; 62(17 Suppl):S32-40. PubMed ID: 24135661
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Computed tomography angiography for guiding and follow-up of magnesium-bioresorbable scaffold implantation.
    Opolski MP, Kepka C, Wojakowski W, Witkowski A.
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2019 Mar 22; 108(3):344-346. PubMed ID: 30182164
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Optical Coherence Tomography Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Ha FJ, Giblett JP, Nerlekar N, Cameron JD, Meredith IT, West NEJ, Brown AJ.
    Heart Lung Circ; 2017 Dec 22; 26(12):1267-1276. PubMed ID: 28818410
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Optical coherence tomography is a kid on the block: I would choose intravascular ultrasound.
    Dash D.
    Indian Heart J; 2017 Dec 22; 69(3):407-410. PubMed ID: 28648442
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Evidence and Clinical Trials.
    Otake H.
    Interv Cardiol Clin; 2023 Apr 22; 12(2):225-236. PubMed ID: 36922063
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Co-registration of optical coherence tomography and X-ray angiography in percutaneous coronary intervention. the Does Optical Coherence Tomography Optimize Revascularization (DOCTOR) fusion study.
    Hebsgaard L, Nielsen TM, Tu S, Krusell LR, Maeng M, Veien KT, Raungaard B, Terkelsen CJ, Kaltoft A, Reiber JH, Lassen JF, Christiansen EH, Holm NR.
    Int J Cardiol; 2015 Mar 01; 182():272-8. PubMed ID: 25585362
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 23.