These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

213 related items for PubMed ID: 30019705

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III: Speech Intelligibility of Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Völker C, Warzybok A, Ernst SM.
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec 30; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721922
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Measuring the effects of reverberation and noise on sentence intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners.
    George EL, Goverts ST, Festen JM, Houtgast T.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Dec 30; 53(6):1429-39. PubMed ID: 20689027
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Development of the Russian matrix sentence test.
    Warzybok A, Zokoll M, Wardenga N, Ozimek E, Boboshko M, Kollmeier B.
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Dec 30; 54 Suppl 2():35-43. PubMed ID: 25843088
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Modeling speech intelligibility in quiet and noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Rhebergen KS, Lyzenga J, Dreschler WA, Festen JM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar 30; 127(3):1570-83. PubMed ID: 20329857
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D, Ahlstrom JB, Bologna WJ, Dubno JR.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun 30; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Large-scale training to increase speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners in novel noises.
    Chen J, Wang Y, Yoho SE, Wang D, Healy EW.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May 30; 139(5):2604. PubMed ID: 27250154
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Influence of noise type on speech reception thresholds across four languages measured with matrix sentence tests.
    Hochmuth S, Kollmeier B, Brand T, Jürgens T.
    Int J Audiol; 2015 May 30; 54 Suppl 2():62-70. PubMed ID: 26097982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T, Fastl H, Baumann U.
    Ear Hear; 2013 May 30; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Signal envelope and speech intelligibility differentially impact auditory motion perception.
    Warnecke M, Litovsky RY.
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jul 23; 11(1):15117. PubMed ID: 34302032
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Masked speech perception across the adult lifespan: Impact of age and hearing impairment.
    Goossens T, Vercammen C, Wouters J, van Wieringen A.
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb 23; 344():109-124. PubMed ID: 27845259
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.