These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


427 related items for PubMed ID: 30036373

  • 1. Rethinking gamete donor care: A satisfaction survey of egg and sperm donors in the UK.
    Williams RA, Machin LL.
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0199971. PubMed ID: 30036373
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Investigating psychosocial attitudes, motivations and experiences of oocyte donors, recipients and egg sharers: a systematic review.
    Bracewell-Milnes T, Saso S, Bora S, Ismail AM, Al-Memar M, Hamed AH, Abdalla H, Thum MY.
    Hum Reprod Update; 2016 Jun; 22(4):450-65. PubMed ID: 27016289
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Preferences and needs regarding future contact with donation offspring among identity-release gamete donors: results from the Swedish Study on Gamete Donation.
    Isaksson S, Sydsjö G, Skoog Svanberg A, Lampic C.
    Fertil Steril; 2014 Oct; 102(4):1160-6. PubMed ID: 25123638
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Gamete donors' satisfaction; gender differences and similarities among oocyte and sperm donors in a national sample.
    Skoog Svanberg A, Lampic C, Gejerwall AL, Gudmundsson J, Karlström PO, Solensten NG, Sydsjö G.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 Sep; 92(9):1049-56. PubMed ID: 23611727
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Support for recognition and payment options for egg and sperm donation in New Zealand and Australia.
    Goedeke S, Shepherd D, Rodino IS.
    Hum Reprod; 2020 Jan 01; 35(1):117-129. PubMed ID: 31967308
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Attitudes of anonymous and identity-release oocyte donors towards future contact with donor offspring.
    Miettinen A, Rotkirch A, Suikkari AM, Söderström-Anttila V.
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Apr 01; 34(4):672-678. PubMed ID: 30805634
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Attitudes about donor information differ greatly between IVF couples using their own gametes and those receiving or donating oocytes or sperm.
    Svanberg AS, Sydsjö G, Bladh M, Lampic C.
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2016 Jun 01; 33(6):703-10. PubMed ID: 27059774
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Attitudes towards disclosure and relationship to donor offspring among a national cohort of identity-release oocyte and sperm donors.
    Lampic C, Skoog Svanberg A, Sydsjö G.
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Sep 01; 29(9):1978-86. PubMed ID: 25030191
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Preliminary study on the experience of egg donors at the CHRU in Tours: Key features for future research].
    Cormery E, Frapsauce C, Malmanche H.
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2020 Apr 01; 48(4):366-373. PubMed ID: 32035169
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Limitations on the compensation of gamete donors: a public opinion survey.
    Lee MS, Farland LV, Missmer SA, Ginsburg ES.
    Fertil Steril; 2017 Jun 01; 107(6):1355-1363.e4. PubMed ID: 28390693
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Anonymous oocyte donation: a follow-up analysis of donors' experiences.
    Jordan CB, Belar CD, Williams RS.
    J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Jun 01; 25(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 15715037
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A comparison of the characteristics, motivations, preferences and expectations of men donating sperm online or through a sperm bank.
    Graham S, Freeman T, Jadva V.
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Nov 01; 34(11):2208-2218. PubMed ID: 31711146
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Looking back: egg donors' retrospective evaluations of their motivations, expectations, and experiences during their first donation cycle.
    Kenney NJ, McGowan ML.
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Feb 01; 93(2):455-66. PubMed ID: 19022427
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 22.