These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

132 related items for PubMed ID: 30075932

  • 1. Reproducibility of an intraoral scanner: A comparison between in-vivo and ex-vivo scans.
    Sun L, Lee JS, Choo HH, Hwang HS, Lee KM.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Aug; 154(2):305-310. PubMed ID: 30075932
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Validity of Intraoral Scans Compared with Plaster Models: An In-Vivo Comparison of Dental Measurements and 3D Surface Analysis.
    Zhang F, Suh KJ, Lee KM.
    PLoS One; 2016 Aug; 11(6):e0157713. PubMed ID: 27304976
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Intraoral 3D Scanning or Dental Impressions for the Assessment of Dental Arch Relationships in Cleft Care: Which is Superior?
    Chalmers EV, McIntyre GT, Wang W, Gillgrass T, Martin CB, Mossey PA.
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2016 Sep; 53(5):568-77. PubMed ID: 26623548
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Accuracy and reproducibility of measurements on plaster models and digital models created using an intraoral scanner.
    Camardella LT, Breuning H, de Vasconcellos Vilella O.
    J Orofac Orthop; 2017 May; 78(3):211-220. PubMed ID: 28074260
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of digital intraoral scanners and alginate impressions: Time and patient satisfaction.
    Burzynski JA, Firestone AR, Beck FM, Fields HW, Deguchi T.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Apr; 153(4):534-541. PubMed ID: 29602345
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of linear measurements on digital models obtained from intraoral and cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions.
    Wiranto MG, Engelbrecht WP, Tutein Nolthenius HE, van der Meer WJ, Ren Y.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jan; 143(1):140-7. PubMed ID: 23273370
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Accuracy of Intraoral Digital Impressions for Whole Upper Jaws, Including Full Dentitions and Palatal Soft Tissues.
    Gan N, Xiong Y, Jiao T.
    PLoS One; 2016 Jan; 11(7):e0158800. PubMed ID: 27383409
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner: an assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance.
    Grünheid T, McCarthy SD, Larson BE.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Nov; 146(5):673-82. PubMed ID: 25439218
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Accuracy of intraoral scans in the mixed dentition: a prospective non-randomized comparative clinical trial.
    Liczmanski K, Stamm T, Sauerland C, Blanck-Lubarsch M.
    Head Face Med; 2020 May 19; 16(1):11. PubMed ID: 32430023
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Three-dimensional evaluation of the repeatability of scans of stone models and impressions using a blue LED scanner.
    Jeon JH, Jung ID, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim WC.
    Dent Mater J; 2015 May 19; 34(5):686-91. PubMed ID: 26438993
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of two intraoral scanners based on three-dimensional surface analysis.
    Lee KM.
    Prog Orthod; 2018 Feb 12; 19(1):6. PubMed ID: 29430612
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Registration accuracy between intraoral-scanned and cone-beam computed tomography-scanned crowns in various registration methods.
    Lim SW, Hwang HS, Cho IS, Baek SH, Cho JH.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Mar 12; 157(3):348-356. PubMed ID: 32115113
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Influence of abutment tooth geometry on the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining dental impressions.
    Carbajal Mejía JB, Wakabayashi K, Nakamura T, Yatani H.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Sep 12; 118(3):392-399. PubMed ID: 28222873
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.