These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

157 related items for PubMed ID: 30111598

  • 1. Female perception of copulatory courtship by male titillators in a bushcricket.
    Wulff NC, Schöneich S, Lehmann GUC.
    Proc Biol Sci; 2018 Aug 15; 285(1884):. PubMed ID: 30111598
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Copulatory courtship by bushcricket genital titillators revealed by functional morphology, μCT scanning for 3D reconstruction and female sense structures.
    Wulff NC, Lehmann AW, Hipsley CA, Lehmann GU.
    Arthropod Struct Dev; 2015 Jul 15; 44(4):388-97. PubMed ID: 26014975
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Copulatory courtship by internal genitalia in bushcrickets.
    Wulff NC, van de Kamp T, Dos Santos Rolo T, Baumbach T, Lehmann GU.
    Sci Rep; 2017 Feb 07; 7():42345. PubMed ID: 28169372
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Sexual selection on bushcricket genitalia operates in a mosaic pattern.
    Wulff NC, Lehmann GUC.
    Ecol Evol; 2020 Mar 07; 10(5):2320-2338. PubMed ID: 32184984
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Increased copulation duration before ejaculate transfer is associated with larger spermatophores, and male genital titillators, across bushcricket taxa.
    Vahed K, Lehmann AW, Gilbert JD, Lehmann GU.
    J Evol Biol; 2011 Sep 07; 24(9):1960-8. PubMed ID: 21658143
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Copulation behaviour of Glossina pallidipes (Diptera: Muscidae) outside and inside the female, with a discussion of genitalic evolution.
    Briceño RD, Eberhard WG, Robinson AS.
    Bull Entomol Res; 2007 Oct 07; 97(5):471-88. PubMed ID: 17916266
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Demonstrating sexual selection by cryptic female choice on male genitalia: What is enough?
    Eberhard WG, Lehmann GUC.
    Evolution; 2019 Dec 07; 73(12):2415-2435. PubMed ID: 31599962
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Copulatory mechanism and functional morphology of genitalia and anal horn of the scorpionfly Cerapanorpa dubia (Mecoptera: Panorpidae).
    Tong X, Zhong W, Hua BZ.
    J Morphol; 2018 Oct 07; 279(10):1532-1539. PubMed ID: 30284342
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Mating termination in the male cricket.
    Sakai M, Taoda Y.
    Acta Biol Hung; 1992 Oct 07; 43(1-4):431-40. PubMed ID: 1299130
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Material heterogeneity of male genitalia reduces genital damage in a bushcricket during sperm removal behaviour.
    Matsumura Y, Jafarpour M, Ramm SA, Reinhold K, Gorb SN, Rajabi H.
    Naturwissenschaften; 2020 Nov 25; 107(6):52. PubMed ID: 33241454
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Copulatory behavior in a pholcid spider: males use specialized genitalic movements for sperm removal and copulatory courtship.
    Calbacho-Rosa L, Galicia-Mendoza I, Dutto MS, Córdoba-Aguilar A, Peretti AV.
    Naturwissenschaften; 2013 May 25; 100(5):407-16. PubMed ID: 23571707
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Traumatic insemination is not the case in three Orius species (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae).
    Taniai K, Arakawa T, Maeda T.
    PLoS One; 2018 May 25; 13(12):e0206225. PubMed ID: 30517107
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Mating behaviour and copulatory mechanism in the scorpionfly Neopanorpa longiprocessa (Mecoptera: Panorpidae).
    Zhong W, Hua B.
    PLoS One; 2013 May 25; 8(9):e74781. PubMed ID: 24086373
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Drosophila pachea asymmetric lobes are part of a grasping device and stabilize one-sided mating.
    Rhebergen FT, Courtier-Orgogozo V, Dumont J, Schilthuizen M, Lang M.
    BMC Evol Biol; 2016 Sep 01; 16(1):176. PubMed ID: 27586247
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. How the length of genital parts affects copulation performance in a carabid beetle: implications for correlated genital evolution between the sexes.
    Okuzaki Y, Sota T.
    J Evol Biol; 2014 Mar 01; 27(3):565-74. PubMed ID: 24471576
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Copulatory courtship and cryptic female choice in red flour beetles Tribolium castaneum.
    Edvardsson M, Arnqvist G.
    Proc Biol Sci; 2000 Mar 22; 267(1443):559-63. PubMed ID: 10787158
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Copulatory mechanism in a sexually cannibalistic spider with genital mutilation (Araneae: Araneidae: Argiope bruennichi).
    Uhl G, Nessler SH, Schneider J.
    Zoology (Jena); 2007 Mar 22; 110(5):398-408. PubMed ID: 17869076
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Genital interactions during simulated copulation among marine mammals.
    Orbach DN, Kelly DA, Solano M, Brennan PLR.
    Proc Biol Sci; 2017 Oct 11; 284(1864):. PubMed ID: 29021172
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Exaggerated male genitalia intensify interspecific reproductive interference by damaging heterospecific female genitalia.
    Kyogoku D, Sota T.
    J Evol Biol; 2015 Jun 11; 28(6):1283-9. PubMed ID: 25882439
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Copulatory behaviour and the process of intromission in Anastrepha ludens (Diptera: Tephritidae).
    Briceño RD, Orozco D, Luis Quintero J, Hanson P, del Refugio Hernández M.
    Rev Biol Trop; 2011 Mar 11; 59(1):291-7. PubMed ID: 21513199
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.