These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

258 related items for PubMed ID: 30115459

  • 1. Condylar hyperplasia: current thinking.
    Higginson JA, Bartram AC, Banks RJ, Keith DJW.
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Oct; 56(8):655-662. PubMed ID: 30115459
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation on the condylar displacement following sagittal split ramus osteotomy in asymmetric setback patients: Comparison between conventional approach and surgery-first approach.
    Oh MH, Hwang HS, Lee KM, Cho JH.
    Angle Orthod; 2017 Sep; 87(5):733-738. PubMed ID: 28530843
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Imaging analysis of temporomandibular joint anatomy changes after intraoral condylectomy combined with orthognathic surgery].
    Luo NJ, Li ZL, Yi B, Liang C, Wang X, Wang XX.
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Jun; 51(6):350-6. PubMed ID: 27256529
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. High condylectomy versus proportional condylectomy: is secondary orthognathic surgery necessary?
    Fariña R, Olate S, Raposo A, Araya I, Alister JP, Uribe F.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Jan; 45(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 26275962
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Micro-computed tomography evaluation of bone architecture in various forms of unilateral condylar hyperplasia.
    Machoň V, Bartoš M, Suchý T, Levorová J, Foltán R.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Jan; 52(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 35680482
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Review and Classification Update: Unilateral condylar hyperplasia.
    Arora KS, Bansal R, Mohapatra S, Pareek S.
    BMJ Case Rep; 2019 Feb 07; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 30737324
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. No differences in morphological characteristics between hyperplastic condyle and class III condyle.
    Goulart DR, Muñoz P, Olate S, de Moraes M, Fariña R.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Oct 07; 44(10):1281-6. PubMed ID: 26112995
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Intraoperative use of a gamma probe for the treatment of condylar hyperplasia: description of a new technique.
    Bouchard C, Paris M, Villemaire JM.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jun 07; 71(6):1099-106. PubMed ID: 23385165
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.