These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

203 related items for PubMed ID: 3012808

  • 21. Sulbactam/ampicillin for treatment of polymicrobial pelvic infections.
    Hemsell DL.
    Drugs; 1986; 31 Suppl 2():22-5. PubMed ID: 3013569
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Ampicillin/sulbactam versus metronidazole-gentamicin in the treatment of soft tissue pelvic infections.
    Crombleholme WR, Ohm-Smith M, Robbie MO, DeKay V, Sweet RL.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Feb; 156(2):507-12. PubMed ID: 3030109
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Ceftazidime/clindamycin versus tobramycin/clindamycin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections.
    Bubrick MP, Heim-Duthoy KL, Yellin AE, Berne TV, Heseltine PN, Appleman MD, Cocchetto DM, Matzke GR.
    Am Surg; 1990 Oct; 56(10):613-7. PubMed ID: 2221611
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Piperacillin and tazobactam versus clindamycin and gentamicin in the treatment of hospitalized women with pelvic infection. The Piperacillin/tazobactam Study Group.
    Sweet RL, Roy S, Faro S, O'Brien WF, Sanfilippo JS, Seidlin M.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Feb; 83(2):280-6. PubMed ID: 8290195
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. [Clinical results with sulbactam/ampicillin in a multicenter study of 425 patients].
    Lode H, Springsklee M.
    Med Klin (Munich); 1989 May 15; 84(5):236-41. PubMed ID: 2661984
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Early postpartum endometritis. Randomized comparison of ampicillin/sulbactam vs. ampicillin, gentamicin and clindamycin.
    Resnik E, Harger JH, Kuller JA.
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Jun 15; 39(6):467-72. PubMed ID: 7932402
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Single-agent therapy for acute pelvic inflammatory disease: sulbactam/ampicillin versus cefoxitin.
    Hemsell DL, Bawdon RE, Hemsell PG, Nobles BJ, Heard MC.
    J Int Med Res; 1990 Jun 15; 18 Suppl 4():85D-89D. PubMed ID: 2282973
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Ampicillin/sulbactam versus clindamycin in the treatment of postpartum endomyometritis.
    Martens MG, Faro S, Hammill HA, Smith D, Riddle G, Maccato M.
    South Med J; 1990 Apr 15; 83(4):408-13. PubMed ID: 2181689
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.