These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

385 related items for PubMed ID: 30144558

  • 1. Non-invasive fetal monitoring using electrocardiography and phonocardiography: A preliminary study.
    Gobillot S, Fontecave-Jallon J, Equy V, Rivet B, Gumery PY, Hoffmann P.
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2018 Nov; 47(9):455-459. PubMed ID: 30144558
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Intrapartum heart rate ambiguity: a comparison of cardiotocogram and abdominal fetal electrocardiogram with maternal electrocardiogram.
    Reinhard J, Hayes-Gill BR, Schiermeier S, Hatzmann H, Heinrich TM, Louwen F.
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2013 Nov; 75(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 23328351
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Validation of beat by beat fetal heart signals acquired from four-channel fetal phonocardiogram with fetal electrocardiogram in healthy late pregnancy.
    Khandoker A, Ibrahim E, Oshio S, Kimura Y.
    Sci Rep; 2018 Sep 11; 8(1):13635. PubMed ID: 30206289
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. New FIGO and Swedish intrapartum cardiotocography classification systems incorporated in the fetal ECG ST analysis (STAN) interpretation algorithm: agreements and discrepancies in cardiotocography classification and evaluation of significant ST events.
    Olofsson P, Norén H, Carlsson A.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2018 Feb 11; 97(2):219-228. PubMed ID: 29215160
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Misidentification of maternal heart rate as fetal on cardiotocography during the second stage of labor: the role of the fetal electrocardiograph.
    Nurani R, Chandraharan E, Lowe V, Ugwumadu A, Arulkumaran S.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2012 Dec 11; 91(12):1428-32. PubMed ID: 22881463
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Emerging Paradigms in Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring: Evaluating the Efficacy and Application of Innovative Textile-Based Wearables.
    Ahmed MR, Newby S, Potluri P, Mirihanage W, Fernando A.
    Sensors (Basel); 2024 Sep 19; 24(18):. PubMed ID: 39338811
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Fetal heart rate estimation from a single phonocardiogram signal using non-negative matrix factorization.
    Dia N, Fontecave-Jallon J, Gumery PY, Rivet B.
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul 19; 2019():5983-5986. PubMed ID: 31947210
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of non-invasive fetal electrocardiogram to Doppler cardiotocogram during the 1st stage of labor.
    Reinhard J, Hayes-Gill BR, Yi Q, Hatzmann H, Schiermeier S.
    J Perinat Med; 2010 Mar 19; 38(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 20121540
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Hidden Markov model in nonnegative matrix factorization for fetal heart rate estimation using physiological priors.
    Reséndiz Rojas M, Fontecave-Jallon J, Rivet B.
    Physiol Meas; 2022 Oct 06; 43(10):. PubMed ID: 36113452
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Quality of fetal heart rate monitoring with transabdominal fetal ECG during maternal movement in labor: A prospective study.
    Reis-de-Carvalho C, Nogueira P, Ayres-de-Campos D.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2022 Nov 06; 101(11):1269-1275. PubMed ID: 35959521
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A novel LabVIEW-based multi-channel non-invasive abdominal maternal-fetal electrocardiogram signal generator.
    Martinek R, Kelnar M, Koudelka P, Vanus J, Bilik P, Janku P, Nazeran H, Zidek J.
    Physiol Meas; 2016 Feb 06; 37(2):238-56. PubMed ID: 26799770
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. eCTG: an automatic procedure to extract digital cardiotocographic signals from digital images.
    Sbrollini A, Agostinelli A, Marcantoni I, Morettini M, Burattini L, Di Nardo F, Fioretti S, Burattini L.
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Mar 06; 156():133-139. PubMed ID: 29428065
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Is short-term-variation of fetal-heart-rate a better predictor of fetal acidaemia in labour? A feasibility study.
    Kapaya H, Jacques R, Almond T, Rosser MH, Anumba D.
    PLoS One; 2020 Mar 06; 15(8):e0236982. PubMed ID: 32745099
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Dynamic segmentation and linear prediction for maternal ECG removal in antenatal abdominal recordings.
    Vullings R, Peters CH, Sluijter RJ, Mischi M, Oei SG, Bergmans JW.
    Physiol Meas; 2009 Mar 06; 30(3):291-307. PubMed ID: 19223679
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Intrapartum signal quality with external fetal heart rate monitoring: a two way trial of external Doppler CTG ultrasound and the abdominal fetal electrocardiogram.
    Reinhard J, Hayes-Gill BR, Schiermeier S, Hatzmann W, Herrmann E, Heinrich TM, Louwen F.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Nov 06; 286(5):1103-7. PubMed ID: 22714064
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Passive fetal monitoring by adaptive wavelet denoising method.
    Vaisman S, Salem SY, Holcberg G, Geva AB.
    Comput Biol Med; 2012 Feb 06; 42(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 22169397
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.