These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

230 related items for PubMed ID: 30150500

  • 1. Comparative Study of Dimensional Accuracy in Three Dental Implant Impression Techniques: Open Tray, Closed Tray with Impression Coping, and Snap Cap.
    Izadi A, Heidari B, Roshanaei G, Allahbakhshi H, Fotovat F.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Aug 01; 19(8):974-981. PubMed ID: 30150500
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Evaluating the Effect of Different Impression Techniques and Splinting Methods on the Dimensional Accuracy of Multiple Implant Impressions: An in vitro Study.
    Saini HS, Jain S, Kumar S, Aggarwal R, Choudhary S, Reddy NK.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Aug 01; 19(8):1005-1012. PubMed ID: 30150505
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Three-dimensional accuracy of different impression techniques for dental implants.
    Nakhaei M, Madani AS, Moraditalab A, Haghi HR.
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2015 Aug 01; 12(5):431-7. PubMed ID: 26604956
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy of Three Different Impression Materials Using Three Different Techniques for Implant Impressions: An In Vitro Study.
    Khan SA, Singh S, Neyaz N, Jaiswal MM, Tanwar AS, Singh A.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Feb 01; 22(2):172-178. PubMed ID: 34257178
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Digital Evaluation of Trueness and Precision of Modern Impression Materials in Implant- Retained Mandibular Overdentures.
    Ghanem RG, Badr AMI, Agamy EMTM, Eyüboğlu TF, Özcan M.
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2024 May 31; 32(2):183-193. PubMed ID: 38691584
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Accuracy of complete-arch implant impression made with occlusal registration material.
    Papazoglou E, Wee AG, Carr AB, Urban I, Margaritis V.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan 31; 123(1):143-148. PubMed ID: 31079882
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Three-dimensional accuracy of innovative implant-level impression techniques with plastic snap-on impression copings.
    Asli HN, Hemmati YB, Falahchai M.
    Dent Med Probl; 2021 Jan 31; 58(3):351-357. PubMed ID: 34435758
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of the accuracy of plastic and metal stock trays for implant impressions.
    Del'acqua MA, de Avila ÉD, Amaral ÂL, Pinelli LA, de Assis Mollo F.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012 Jan 31; 27(3):544-50. PubMed ID: 22616047
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Evaluation of accuracy of complete-arch multiple-unit abutment-level dental implant impressions using different impression and splinting materials.
    Buzayan M, Baig MR, Yunus N.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013 Jan 31; 28(6):1512-20. PubMed ID: 24278919
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Accuracy of impressions with different impression materials in angulated implants.
    Reddy S, Prasad K, Vakil H, Jain A, Chowdhary R.
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2013 Jan 31; 16(3):279-84. PubMed ID: 23771446
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Accuracy of 2 impression techniques for ITI implants.
    Akça K, Cehreli MC.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004 Jan 31; 19(4):517-23. PubMed ID: 15346748
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Verification jig for implant-supported prostheses: A comparison of standard impressions with verification jigs made of different materials.
    De La Cruz JE, Funkenbusch PD, Ercoli C, Moss ME, Graser GN, Tallents RH.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Sep 31; 88(3):329-36. PubMed ID: 12426505
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Accuracy of multi-unit implant impression: traditional techniques versus a digital procedure.
    Menini M, Setti P, Pera F, Pera P, Pesce P.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Apr 31; 22(3):1253-1262. PubMed ID: 28965251
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Influence of impression material and time on the 3-dimensional accuracy of implant impressions.
    Holst S, Blatz MB, Bergler M, Goellner M, Wichmann M.
    Quintessence Int; 2007 Jan 31; 38(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 17216911
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of the accuracy of Biomet 3i Encode Robocast Technology and conventional implant impression techniques.
    Howell KJ, McGlumphy EA, Drago C, Knapik G.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013 Jan 31; 28(1):228-40. PubMed ID: 23377070
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Accuracy of implant impressions with different impression coping types and shapes.
    Rashidan N, Alikhasi M, Samadizadeh S, Beyabanaki E, Kharazifard MJ.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr 31; 14(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 19804420
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Accuracy of tooth-implant impressions: Comparison of five different techniques.
    Fathi A, Rismanchian M, Yazdekhasti A, Salamati M.
    Clin Exp Dent Res; 2023 Jun 31; 9(3):526-534. PubMed ID: 37042090
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The Accuracy of Casts Obtained Using Different Impression Techniques and Impression Materials in Combined Parallel and Angulated Implants: An In Vitro Study.
    V M, Chirom B, Gunadhar K, Priyadarshini S, Nongthombam RS, P M.
    Cureus; 2024 Apr 31; 16(4):e59193. PubMed ID: 38807829
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparative evaluation of the effects of implant position, impression material, and tray type on implant impression accuracy.
    Gökçen-Rohlig B, Ongül D, Sancakli E, Sermet B.
    Implant Dent; 2014 Jun 31; 23(3):283-8. PubMed ID: 24844388
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.