These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
153 related items for PubMed ID: 30154293
21. Influence of different setups of the Frankfort horizontal plane on 3-dimensional cephalometric measurements. Santos RMGD, De Martino JM, Haiter Neto F, Passeri LA. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Aug; 152(2):242-249. PubMed ID: 28760286 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. [Centrographic analysis in Shanghai adults with normal occlusion]. Gong YH, Wei TT, Tang GH. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2012 Jun; 21(3):303-7. PubMed ID: 22885492 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Influence of magnification and superimposition of structures on cephalometric diagnosis. Paula LK, Solon-de-Mello Pde A, Mattos CT, Ruellas AC, Sant'Anna EF. Dental Press J Orthod; 2015 Jun; 20(2):29-34. PubMed ID: 25992984 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Skeletal and dental asymmetries in Class II subdivision malocclusions using cone-beam computed tomography. Sanders DA, Rigali PH, Neace WP, Uribe F, Nanda R. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):542.e1-20; discussion 542-3. PubMed ID: 21055586 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Correlation between craniofacial structures, anthropometric measurements, and nasopharyngeal dimensions in black adolescents. Al-Jewair T, Marwah S, Preston CB, Wu Y, Yu G. Int Orthod; 2021 Mar; 19(1):96-106. PubMed ID: 33516651 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The relationship between the incisor position and lingual surface morphology in normal occlusion. Hasegawa Y, Ezura A, Nomintsetseg B. Odontology; 2017 Jan; 105(1):84-90. PubMed ID: 27011328 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Three-dimensional Procrustes analysis of modern human craniofacial form. Badawi-Fayad J, Cabanis EA. Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2007 Mar; 290(3):268-76. PubMed ID: 17525943 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. [An cephalomectric study on craniofacial structures of Uygur adults with normal occlusion in Xinjiang autonomous region]. Jin H, Luo S, Bai D, Liu G, Song J. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2000 Jun; 18(3):189-91, 194. PubMed ID: 12539675 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Correlation between craniofacial growth and upper and lower body heights in subjects with Class I occlusion. Al-Jewair TS, Preston CB, Flores-Mir C, Ziarnowski P. Dental Press J Orthod; 2018 Jun; 23(2):37-45. PubMed ID: 29898156 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Effect of Craniofacial Morphology on Pharyngeal Airway Volume Measured Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT)-A Retrospective Pilot Study. Diwakar R, Kochhar AS, Gupta H, Kaur H, Sidhu MS, Skountrianos H, Singh G, Tepedino M. Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 May 10; 18(9):. PubMed ID: 34068732 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Craniofacial morphology in pediatric patients with persistent obstructive sleep apnea with or without positive airway pressure therapy: a cross-sectional cephalometric comparison with controls. Korayem MM, Witmans M, MacLean J, Heo G, El-Hakim H, Flores-Mir C, Major PW. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jul 10; 144(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 23810049 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Morphometry of the cranial base and the cranial-cervical-mandibular system in young patients with type II, division 1 malocclusion, using tomographic cone beam. Bedoya A, Landa Nieto Z, Zuluaga LL, Rocabado M. Cranio; 2014 Jul 10; 32(3):199-207. PubMed ID: 25000162 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Accuracy and reliability of linear cephalometric measurements from cone-beam computed tomography scans of a dry human skull. Berco M, Rigali PH, Miner RM, DeLuca S, Anderson NK, Will LA. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul 10; 136(1):17.e1-9; discussion 17-8. PubMed ID: 19577142 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Smile analysis in different facial patterns and its correlation with underlying hard tissues. Grover N, Kapoor DN, Verma S, Bharadwaj P. Prog Orthod; 2015 Jul 10; 16():28. PubMed ID: 26341345 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Nevoid Basal cell carcinoma syndrome: a cephalometric study of patients and controls. Leonardi R, Licciardello V, Santarelli A, Ciavarella D, Bolouri S, Härle F, Caltabiano M, Lo Muzio L. J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Jan 10; 20(1):203-8. PubMed ID: 19165028 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Craniofacial changes in Icelandic children between 6 and 16 years of age - a longitudinal study. Thordarson A, Johannsdottir B, Magnusson TE. Eur J Orthod; 2006 Apr 10; 28(2):152-65. PubMed ID: 16230326 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. A comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional cephalometry on frontal radiographs and on cone beam computed tomography scans of human skulls. van Vlijmen OJ, Maal TJ, Bergé SJ, Bronkhorst EM, Katsaros C, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun 10; 117(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 19583759 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of maxillary incisive canal characteristics related to dental implant treatment with computerized tomography: a clinical multicenter study. Tözüm TF, Güncü GN, Yıldırım YD, Yılmaz HG, Galindo-Moreno P, Velasco-Torres M, Al-Hezaimi K, Al-Sadhan R, Karabulut E, Wang HL. J Periodontol; 2012 Mar 10; 83(3):337-43. PubMed ID: 21910596 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluating craniofacial asymmetry with digital cephalometric images and cone-beam computed tomography. de Moraes ME, Hollender LG, Chen CS, Moraes LC, Balducci I. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jun 10; 139(6):e523-31. PubMed ID: 21640864 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]