These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
131 related items for PubMed ID: 30154350
1. Milk Protein Concentration Using Negatively Charged Ultrafiltration Membranes. Arunkumar A, Etzel MR. Foods; 2018 Aug 28; 7(9):. PubMed ID: 30154350 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of adjusted pH prior to ultrafiltration of skim milk on membrane performance and physical functionality of milk protein concentrate. Luo X, Vasiljevic T, Ramchandran L. J Dairy Sci; 2016 Feb 28; 99(2):1083-1094. PubMed ID: 26686705 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A process efficiency assessment of serum protein removal from milk using ceramic graded permeability microfiltration membrane. Tremblay-Marchand D, Doyen A, Britten M, Pouliot Y. J Dairy Sci; 2016 Jul 28; 99(7):5230-5243. PubMed ID: 27132105 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of ceramic membrane channel diameter on limiting retentate protein concentration during skim milk microfiltration. Adams MC, Barbano DM. J Dairy Sci; 2016 Jan 28; 99(1):167-82. PubMed ID: 26519975 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of soluble calcium and lactose on limiting flux and serum protein removal during skim milk microfiltration. Adams MC, Hurt EE, Barbano DM. J Dairy Sci; 2015 Nov 28; 98(11):7483-97. PubMed ID: 26298759 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Retention of small charged impurities during ultrafiltration. Shao J, Zydney AL. Biotechnol Bioeng; 2004 Jul 05; 87(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 15211483 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Thermal stability of reconstituted milk protein concentrates: Effect of partial calcium depletion during membrane filtration. Eshpari H, Jimenez-Flores R, Tong PS, Corredig M. Food Res Int; 2017 Dec 05; 102():409-418. PubMed ID: 29195966 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Separation of protein charge variants by ultrafiltration. Ebersold MF, Zydney AL. Biotechnol Prog; 2004 Dec 05; 20(2):543-9. PubMed ID: 15059001 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Production efficiency of micellar casein concentrate using polymeric spiral-wound microfiltration membranes. Beckman SL, Zulewska J, Newbold M, Barbano DM. J Dairy Sci; 2010 Oct 05; 93(10):4506-17. PubMed ID: 20854984 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Recovery of small dye molecules from aqueous solutions using charged ultrafiltration membranes. Chen X, Zhao Y, Moutinho J, Shao J, Zydney AL, He Y. J Hazard Mater; 2015 Mar 02; 284():58-64. PubMed ID: 25463218 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Preparation of milk protein concentrates by ultrafiltration and continuous diafiltration: Effect of process design on overall efficiency. Gavazzi-April C, Benoit S, Doyen A, Britten M, Pouliot Y. J Dairy Sci; 2018 Nov 02; 101(11):9670-9679. PubMed ID: 30172402 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Charged ultrafiltration membranes increase the selectivity of whey protein separations. Bhushan S, Etzel MR. J Food Sci; 2009 Apr 02; 74(3):E131-9. PubMed ID: 19397718 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Separation of milk fat globules via microfiltration: Effect of diafiltration media and opportunities for stream valorization. Jukkola A, Partanen R, Rojas OJ, Heino A. J Dairy Sci; 2016 Nov 02; 99(11):8644-8654. PubMed ID: 27638266 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of diafiltration media and filtration modes on fouling and performance in skim milk microfiltration: A comparative study. Mardal F, Parjikolaei BR, Corredig M. J Dairy Sci; 2024 Dec 02; 107(12):10414-10425. PubMed ID: 39098495 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]