These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

165 related items for PubMed ID: 30166830

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Efficacy of Periapical Radiography and Three Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Systems for Detection of Peri-Implant Dehiscence Defects: An in- Vitro Study.
    V A, A E, S S, M R J, Gholi Mezerji N M.
    J Biomed Phys Eng; 2020 Dec; 10(6):751-760. PubMed ID: 33364213
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Evaluation of the accuracy of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in the detection of peri-implant fenestration.
    Gholampour A, Mollaei M, Ehsani H, Ghobadi F, Hosseinnataj A, Yazdani M.
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Aug 09; 24(1):922. PubMed ID: 39123157
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effect of a metal artifact reduction algorithm on dehiscence and fenestration detection around zirconia implants with cone beam computed tomography.
    Freire BB, Wanderley VA, Câmara JVF, Santos LA, Ferrari CR, Araujo TT, Chilvarquer I.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2024 Aug 09; 138(2):316-323. PubMed ID: 38493025
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of the different voxel sizes in the estimation of peri-implant fenestration defects using cone beam computed tomography: an ex vivo study.
    Kurt MH, Bağış N, Evli C, Atakan C, Orhan K.
    Int J Implant Dent; 2020 Oct 02; 6(1):58. PubMed ID: 33006000
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Assessment of peri-implant defects at titanium and zirconium dioxide implants by means of periapical radiographs and cone beam computed tomography: An in-vitro examination.
    Steiger-Ronay V, Krcmaric Z, Schmidlin PR, Sahrmann P, Wiedemeier DB, Benic GI.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Dec 02; 29(12):1195-1201. PubMed ID: 30387207
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The efficacy of metal artifact reduction (MAR) algorithm in cone-beam computed tomography on the diagnostic accuracy of fenestration and dehiscence around dental implants.
    Sheikhi M, Behfarnia P, Mostajabi M, Nasri N.
    J Periodontol; 2020 Feb 02; 91(2):209-214. PubMed ID: 31364765
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Efficacy of cone-beam computed tomography with modified gray-scale range versus digital periapical radiography for the assessment of bone-implant interface gaps.
    Kajan ZD, Abbasi S, Khosravifard N, Sigaroudi AK, Motevasseli S.
    Oral Radiol; 2022 Jan 02; 38(1):80-88. PubMed ID: 33893899
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.