These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
237 related items for PubMed ID: 30170139
1. The functional, spatio-temporal and satisfaction outcomes of transtibial amputees with a hydrocast socket following an extended usage period in an under-resourced environment. Laing S, Lee PVS, Lavranos J, Lythgo N. Gait Posture; 2018 Oct; 66():88-93. PubMed ID: 30170139 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Transtibial Prosthetic Socket Shape in a Developing Country: A study to compare initial outcomes in Pressure Cast hydrostatic and Patella Tendon Bearing designs. Laing S, Lythgo N, Lavranos J, Lee PVS. Gait Posture; 2017 Oct; 58():363-368. PubMed ID: 28869901 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. An Investigation of Pressure Profiles and Wearer Comfort During Walking With a Transtibial Hydrocast Socket. Laing S, Lythgo N, Lavranos J, Lee PVS. Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2019 Mar; 98(3):199-206. PubMed ID: 30222605 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Dynamic alignment of transtibial prostheses through visualization of socket reaction moments. Kobayashi T, Orendurff MS, Boone DA. Prosthet Orthot Int; 2015 Dec; 39(6):512-6. PubMed ID: 25121726 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Dynamic alignment using external socket reaction moments in trans-tibial amputees. Jonkergouw N, Prins MR, van der Wurff P, Gijsbers J, Houdijk H, Buis AWP. Gait Posture; 2019 Feb; 68():122-129. PubMed ID: 30472524 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Socket/stump interface dynamic pressure distributions recorded during the prosthetic stance phase of gait of a trans-tibial amputee wearing a hydrocast socket. Convery P, Buis AW. Prosthet Orthot Int; 1999 Aug; 23(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 10493137 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of transverse prosthetic alignment changes on socket reaction moments during gait in individuals with transtibial amputation. Hashimoto H, Kobayashi T, Gao F, Kataoka M, Orendurff MS, Okuda K. Gait Posture; 2018 Sep; 65():8-14. PubMed ID: 30558951 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The effects of suction and pin/lock suspension systems on transtibial amputees' gait performance. Gholizadeh H, Abu Osman NA, Eshraghi A, Ali S. PLoS One; 2014 Sep; 9(5):e94520. PubMed ID: 24827560 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A Prospective Assessment of an Adjustable, Immediate Fit, Transtibial Prosthesis. Dillingham T, Kenia J, Shofer F, Marschalek J. PM R; 2019 Nov; 11(11):1210-1217. PubMed ID: 30734517 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Pressure casting technique for transtibial prosthetic socket fit in developing countries. Lee PV, Lythgo N, Laing S, Lavranos J, Thanh NH. J Rehabil Res Dev; 2014 Nov; 51(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 24805897 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The benefits of using a vacuum-assisted socket system to improve balance and gait in elderly transtibial amputees. Samitier CB, Guirao L, Costea M, Camós JM, Pleguezuelos E. Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Feb; 40(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 25261489 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Techniques for Interface Stress Measurements within Prosthetic Sockets of Transtibial Amputees: A Review of the Past 50 Years of Research. Al-Fakih EA, Abu Osman NA, Mahmad Adikan FR. Sensors (Basel); 2016 Jul 20; 16(7):. PubMed ID: 27447646 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of a flexible pylon system on functional mobility of transtibial amputees. A prospective randomized study. Lass R, Kickinger W, Guglia P, Kubista B, Kastner J, Windhager R, Holzer G. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2013 Dec 20; 49(6):837-47. PubMed ID: 23860421 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of vacuum and KBM prosthetic fitting for unilateral transtibial amputees using the Gait Profile Score. Kuntze Ferreira AE, Neves EB. Gait Posture; 2015 Feb 20; 41(2):683-7. PubMed ID: 25684145 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of prosthetic alignment changes on socket reaction moment impulse during walking in transtibial amputees. Kobayashi T, Orendurff MS, Arabian AK, Rosenbaum-Chou TG, Boone DA. J Biomech; 2014 Apr 11; 47(6):1315-23. PubMed ID: 24612718 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A randomized controlled trial comparing functional outcome and cost efficiency of a total surface-bearing socket versus a conventional patellar tendon-bearing socket in transtibial amputees. Selles RW, Janssens PJ, Jongenengel CD, Bussmann JB. Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2005 Jan 11; 86(1):154-61; quiz 180. PubMed ID: 15641007 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Engineering a trans-tibial prosthetic socket for the lower limb amputee. Laing S, Lee PV, Goh JCh. Ann Acad Med Singap; 2011 May 11; 40(5):252-9. PubMed ID: 21678017 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Longitudinal changes in transtibial amputee gait characteristics when negotiating a change in surface height during continuous gait. Barnett CT, Polman RC, Vanicek N. Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2014 Aug 11; 29(7):787-93. PubMed ID: 24954101 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Dynamic interface pressure distributions of two transtibial prosthetic socket concepts. Dumbleton T, Buis AW, McFadyen A, McHugh BF, McKay G, Murray KD, Sexton S. J Rehabil Res Dev; 2009 Aug 11; 46(3):405-15. PubMed ID: 19675992 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]