These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


202 related items for PubMed ID: 30182303

  • 21. The role of axial resolution of optical coherence tomography on the measurement of corneal and epithelial thicknesses.
    Ge L, Yuan Y, Shen M, Tao A, Wang J, Lu F.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Jan 28; 54(1):746-55. PubMed ID: 23139281
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. [Reproducibility of the measurement of central corneal thickness in healthy subjects obtained with the optical low coherence reflectometry pachymeter and comparison with the ultrasonic pachymetry].
    Garza-Leon M, Plancarte-Lozano E, Valle-Penella AD, Guzmán-Martínez ML, Villarreal-González A.
    Cir Cir; 2018 Jan 28; 86(1):50-55. PubMed ID: 29681640
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Consistency of corneal sublayer thickness measurements using Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography after phacoemulsification.
    López-Miguel A, Calabuig-Goena M, Marqués-Fernández V, Fernández I, Alió JL, Maldonado MJ.
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2016 Nov 04; 26(6):540-545. PubMed ID: 26980112
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Comparison of central corneal thickness measured by ultrasound pachymetry, corneal topography, spectral domain- optical coherence tomography, and non-contact specular microscopy.
    Ulutas HG, Ozkaya G, Amuk Hamidi N.
    Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2023 Jun 04; 42():103527. PubMed ID: 36966866
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements with Four Different New Devices and Ultrasound Pachymetry.
    Şimşek C, Kaya C, Karalezli A.
    Turk J Ophthalmol; 2022 Oct 28; 52(5):318-323. PubMed ID: 36317802
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Precision of high definition spectral-domain optical coherence tomography for measuring central corneal thickness.
    Correa-Pérez ME, López-Miguel A, Miranda-Anta S, Iglesias-Cortiñas D, Alió JL, Maldonado MJ.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Apr 06; 53(4):1752-7. PubMed ID: 22395881
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Repeatability, Reproducibility and Agreement of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements by Two Noncontact Pachymetry Devices.
    Kocamis O, Kilic R.
    Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol; 2019 Apr 06; 8(1):34-39. PubMed ID: 30923721
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Comparison of central corneal thickness using optical low-coherence reflectometry and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.
    López-Miguel A, Correa-Pérez ME, Miranda-Anta S, Iglesias-Cortiñas D, Coco-Martín MB, Maldonado MJ.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 May 06; 38(5):758-64. PubMed ID: 22436868
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.