These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

180 related items for PubMed ID: 30198852

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Iatrogenic Ureteral Injury Treatment with Biodegradable Antireflux Heparin-Coated Ureteral Stent-Animal Model Comparative Study.
    Soria F, de La Cruz JE, Budia A, Cepeda M, Álvarez S, Serrano Á, Sanchez-Margallo FM.
    J Endourol; 2021 Aug; 35(8):1244-1249. PubMed ID: 33626973
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Preliminary Assessment of a New Antireflux Ureteral Stent Design in Swine Model.
    Soria F, Morcillo E, Serrano A, Rioja J, Budia A, Moreno J, Sanchez-Margallo FM.
    Urology; 2015 Aug; 86(2):417-22. PubMed ID: 26189140
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparative assessment of biodegradable-antireflux heparine coated ureteral stent: animal model study.
    Soria F, de La Cruz JE, Caballero-Romeu JP, Pamplona M, Pérez-Fentes D, Resel-Folskerma L, Sanchez-Margallo FM.
    BMC Urol; 2021 Feb 28; 21(1):32. PubMed ID: 33639905
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Drainage and antireflux characteristics of a biodegradable self-reinforced, self-expanding X-ray-positive poly-L,D-lactide spiral partial ureteral stent: an experimental study.
    Lumiaho J, Heino A, Kauppinen T, Talja M, Alhava E, Välimaa T, Törmälä P.
    J Endourol; 2007 Dec 28; 21(12):1559-64. PubMed ID: 18186698
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Evaluation of the duration of ureteral stenting following endopyelotomy: Animal study.
    Soria F, Rioja LA, Blas M, Duran E, Uson J.
    Int J Urol; 2006 Oct 28; 13(10):1333-8. PubMed ID: 17010014
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Insertion of a single double-J stent for bilateral open ureteral reimplantation: introducing a novel technique and assessment of feasibility.
    Nabavizadeh B, Keihani S, Hosseini Sharifi SH, Kajbafzadeh AM.
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2016 Jul 28; 48(7):1015-9. PubMed ID: 27043029
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Evaluation of optimal stent size after antegrade endopyelotomy: an experimental study in the porcine model.
    Anidjar M, Meria P, Cochand-Priollet B, Cussenot O, Desgrandchamps F, Cortesse A, Teillac P, Le Duc A.
    Eur Urol; 1997 Jul 28; 32(2):245-52. PubMed ID: 9286661
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Assessment of the Grades of Vesicoureteral Reflux in Stented Ureters: An Experimental Study.
    de la Cruz JE, Fernández I, Sanz-Migueláñez JL, Fernández-Aparicio T, Sánchez-Margallo FM, Soria F.
    Urol Int; 2021 Jul 28; 105(7-8):554-559. PubMed ID: 33951641
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.