These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
261 related items for PubMed ID: 30204510
21. Voice gender and the segregation of competing talkers: Perceptual learning in cochlear implant simulations. Sullivan JR, Assmann PF, Hossain S, Schafer EC. J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):1643. PubMed ID: 28372046 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation? Hochmuth S, Jürgens T, Brand T, Kollmeier B. Int J Audiol; 2015 Mar; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. A physiologically-inspired model reproducing the speech intelligibility benefit in cochlear implant listeners with residual acoustic hearing. Zamaninezhad L, Hohmann V, Büchner A, Schädler MR, Jürgens T. Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():50-61. PubMed ID: 27838372 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The effect of presentation level and stimulation rate on speech perception and modulation detection for cochlear implant users. Brochier T, McDermott HJ, McKay CM. J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4097. PubMed ID: 28618807 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Large-scale training to increase speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners in novel noises. Chen J, Wang Y, Yoho SE, Wang D, Healy EW. J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2604. PubMed ID: 27250154 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Speech reception with different bilateral directional processing schemes: Influence of binaural hearing, audiometric asymmetry, and acoustic scenario. Neher T, Wagener KC, Latzel M. Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():36-48. PubMed ID: 28783570 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Effects of directional sound processing and listener's motivation on EEG responses to continuous noisy speech: Do normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners differ? Mirkovic B, Debener S, Schmidt J, Jaeger M, Neher T. Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():260-270. PubMed ID: 31003037 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss. Fogerty D, Ahlstrom JB, Bologna WJ, Dubno JR. J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Voice emotion recognition by cochlear-implanted children and their normally-hearing peers. Chatterjee M, Zion DJ, Deroche ML, Burianek BA, Limb CJ, Goren AP, Kulkarni AM, Christensen JA. Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():151-62. PubMed ID: 25448167 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Development and validation of the Leuven intelligibility sentence test with male speaker (LIST-m). Jansen S, Koning R, Wouters J, van Wieringen A. Int J Audiol; 2014 Jan; 53(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 24152309 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Effects of noise and working memory capacity on memory processing of speech for hearing-aid users. Ng EH, Rudner M, Lunner T, Pedersen MS, Rönnberg J. Int J Audiol; 2013 Jul; 52(7):433-41. PubMed ID: 23550584 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The use of cochlear's SCAN and wireless microphones to improve speech understanding in noise with the Nucleus6® CP900 processor. De Ceulaer G, Pascoal D, Vanpoucke F, Govaerts PJ. Int J Audiol; 2017 Nov; 56(11):837-843. PubMed ID: 28695749 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Matching Automatic Gain Control Across Devices in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users. Veugen LC, Chalupper J, Snik AF, Opstal AJ, Mens LH. Ear Hear; 2016 Nov; 37(3):260-70. PubMed ID: 26656192 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Peripheral hearing loss reduces the ability of children to direct selective attention during multi-talker listening. Holmes E, Kitterick PT, Summerfield AQ. Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():160-172. PubMed ID: 28505526 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]