These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
263 related items for PubMed ID: 30209970
1. Dislocation of large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty and hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Miettinen SSA, Mäkinen TJ, Laaksonen I, Mäkelä K, Huhtala H, Kettunen JS, Remes V. Hip Int; 2019 May; 29(3):253-261. PubMed ID: 30209970 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A prospective comparative study of hip resurfacing arthroplasty and large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty in younger patients-a minimum of five year follow-up. Tao R, Liu F, Liu YK, Lu Y, Xu H, Cao Y, Zhou ZY, Wang W. Int Orthop; 2018 Oct; 42(10):2323-2327. PubMed ID: 29455347 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Total hip arthroplasty survival in femoral head avascular necrosis versus primary hip osteoarthritis: Case-control study with a mean 10-year follow-up after anatomical cementless metal-on-metal 28-mm replacement. Ancelin D, Reina N, Cavaignac E, Delclaux S, Chiron P. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2016 Dec; 102(8):1029-1034. PubMed ID: 28341264 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Same survival but higher rate of osteolysis for metal-on-metal Ultamet versus ceramic-on-ceramic in patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty after 8 years of follow-up. Higuchi Y, Seki T, Takegami Y, Komatsu D, Morita D, Ishiguro N. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2018 Dec; 104(8):1155-1161. PubMed ID: 30269967 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. High Revision Rate for Large-head Metal-on-metal THA at a Mean of 7.1 Years: A Registry Study. Seppänen M, Laaksonen I, Pulkkinen P, Eskelinen A, Puhto AP, Kettunen J, Leskinen J, Manninen M, Mäkelä K. Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Jun; 476(6):1223-1230. PubMed ID: 29480891 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Outcome of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty in Management of Failed Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty. Rahman WA, Amenábar T, Hetaimish BM, Safir OA, Kuzyk PR, Gross AE. J Arthroplasty; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2559-2563. PubMed ID: 27378637 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Adverse Reactions to Metal on Metal Are Not Exclusive to Large Heads in Total Hip Arthroplasty. Lombardi AV, Berend KR, Adams JB, Satterwhite KL. Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):432-40. PubMed ID: 26497881 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for Aseptically Failed Metal-On-Metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty. Salmons HI, Fruth KM, Lewallen DG, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ, Abdel MP. J Arthroplasty; 2022 Dec; 37(12):2399-2405. PubMed ID: 35738361 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Are ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in total hip arthroplasty associated with reduced revision risk for late dislocation? Pitto RP, Garland M, Sedel L. Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3790-5. PubMed ID: 26070775 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Outcomes after revision of metal on metal hip resurfacing to total arthroplasty using the direct anterior approach. Bouveau V, Haen TX, Poupon J, Nich C. Int Orthop; 2018 Nov; 42(11):2543-2548. PubMed ID: 29520467 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. High rate of infection after aseptic revision of failed metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. Wyles CC, Van Demark RE, Sierra RJ, Trousdale RT. Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Feb; 472(2):509-16. PubMed ID: 23846604 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Revisions of Modular Metal-on-metal THA Have a High Risk of Early Complications. Jennings JM, White S, Martin JR, Yang CC, Miner TM, Dennis DA. Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Feb; 477(2):344-350. PubMed ID: 30794222 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. What are the risk factors for dislocation in primary total hip arthroplasty? A multicenter case-control study of 128 unstable and 438 stable hips. Fessy MH, Putman S, Viste A, Isida R, Ramdane N, Ferreira A, Leglise A, Rubens-Duval B, Bonin N, Bonnomet F, Combes A, Boisgard S, Mainard D, Leclercq S, Migaud H, SFHG. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Sep; 103(5):663-668. PubMed ID: 28629944 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Reducing the failure rate of hip resurfacing in dysplasia patients: a retrospective analysis of 363 cases. Gaillard MD, Gross TP. BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Jun 07; 17():251. PubMed ID: 27267594 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Poor 10-year survivorship of hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Seppänen M, Karvonen M, Virolainen P, Remes V, Pulkkinen P, Eskelinen A, Liukas A, Mäkelä KT. Acta Orthop; 2016 Dec 07; 87(6):554-559. PubMed ID: 27759474 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Complications Following Revision of Metal-on-Metal Versus Metal-on-Polyethylene Total Hip Arthroplasty. Nishio S, Fukunishi S, Yoshiya S, Sing DC, Hansen EN, Vail TP. Orthopedics; 2017 Jan 01; 40(1):e164-e169. PubMed ID: 27783837 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Ceramic-on-ceramic THA associated with fewer dislocations and less muscle degeneration by preserving muscle progenitors. Hernigou P, Roussignol X, Delambre J, Poignard A, Flouzat-Lachaniette CH. Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec 01; 473(12):3762-9. PubMed ID: 26054482 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The fate of femoral head autograft in acetabular reconstruction in dysplastic hips at midterm. Hamrayev AJ, Buyukkuscu MO, Misir A, Gursu SS. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2020 Dec 01; 28(3):2309499020957109. PubMed ID: 32996378 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Complications and re-revisions after revisions of 528 metal-on-metal hips because of adverse reaction to metal debris. Lainiala O, Reito A, Nieminen J, Eskelinen A. Acta Orthop; 2020 Aug 01; 91(4):365-371. PubMed ID: 32285741 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Outcomes of different bearings in total hip arthroplasty - implant survival, revision causes, and patient-reported outcome. Varnum C. Dan Med J; 2017 Mar 01; 64(3):. PubMed ID: 28260601 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]