These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


432 related items for PubMed ID: 30231086

  • 1. Effect of Plasma Oxidation-Treated TiOx Film on Early Osseointegration.
    Jiang H, Zhang T, Zhou W, Lin Z, Liu Z.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(5):1011-1018. PubMed ID: 30231086
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The effect of strontium-loaded rough titanium surface on early osseointegration.
    Huanhuan J, Pengjie H, Sheng X, Binchen W, Li S.
    J Biomater Appl; 2017 Nov; 32(5):561-569. PubMed ID: 29022842
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The relative effect of surface strontium chemistry and super-hydrophilicity on the early osseointegration of moderately rough titanium surface in the rabbit femur.
    Park JW, Kwon TG, Suh JY.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jun; 24(6):706-9. PubMed ID: 22409778
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of early osseointegration between laser-treated/acid-etched and sandblasted/acid-etched titanium implant surfaces.
    Rong M, Lu H, Wan L, Zhang X, Lin X, Li S, Zhou L, Lv Y, Su Y.
    J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2018 Mar 30; 29(4):43. PubMed ID: 29603028
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Bone apposition around two different sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implant surfaces: a histomorphometric study in canine mandibles.
    Bornstein MM, Valderrama P, Jones AA, Wilson TG, Seibl R, Cochran DL.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Mar 30; 19(3):233-41. PubMed ID: 18177427
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Effect of electrochemically deposited nanohydroxyapatite on bone bonding of sandblasted/dual acid-etched titanium implant.
    He F, Yang G, Wang X, Zhao S.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009 Mar 30; 24(5):790-9. PubMed ID: 19865618
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The use of reduced healing times on ITI implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface: early results from clinical trials on ITI SLA implants.
    Cochran DL, Buser D, ten Bruggenkate CM, Weingart D, Taylor TM, Bernard JP, Peters F, Simpson JP.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2002 Apr 30; 13(2):144-53. PubMed ID: 11952734
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Biomechanical evaluation of the interfacial strength of a chemically modified sandblasted and acid-etched titanium surface.
    Ferguson SJ, Broggini N, Wieland M, de Wild M, Rupp F, Geis-Gerstorfer J, Cochran DL, Buser D.
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2006 Aug 30; 78(2):291-7. PubMed ID: 16637025
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of two dental implant surface modifications on implants with same macrodesign: an experimental study in the pelvic sheep model.
    Ernst S, Stübinger S, Schüpbach P, Sidler M, Klein K, Ferguson SJ, von Rechenberg B.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Aug 30; 26(8):898-908. PubMed ID: 24954017
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 22.