These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


452 related items for PubMed ID: 30244476

  • 1. The Hadlock Method Is Superior to Newer Methods for the Prediction of the Birth Weight Percentile.
    Blue NR, Savabi M, Beddow ME, Katukuri VR, Fritts CM, Izquierdo LA, Chao CR.
    J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Mar; 38(3):587-596. PubMed ID: 30244476
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonate by third-trimester fetal biometry and impact of ultrasound-delivery interval.
    Reboul Q, Delabaere A, Luo ZC, Nuyt AM, Wu Y, Chauleur C, Fraser W, Audibert F.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Mar; 49(3):372-378. PubMed ID: 27153518
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparing the Hadlock fetal growth standard to the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development racial/ethnic standard for the prediction of neonatal morbidity and small for gestational age.
    Blue NR, Beddow ME, Savabi M, Katukuri VR, Chao CR.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):474.e1-474.e12. PubMed ID: 30118689
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Routine ultrasound at 32 vs 36 weeks' gestation: prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates.
    Ciobanu A, Khan N, Syngelaki A, Akolekar R, Nicolaides KH.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jun; 53(6):761-768. PubMed ID: 30883981
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Prediction of Neonatal Growth Restriction in Fetuses With Gastroschisis by Early Third Trimester Ultrasonography Utilizing Contemporary Birth Weight Percentiles.
    McKenna M, McKenna D, Zhou M, Sonek J, Wiegand S.
    J Ultrasound Med; 2023 May; 42(5):997-1005. PubMed ID: 36177800
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A Comparison of Methods for the Diagnosis of Fetal Growth Restriction Between the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
    Blue NR, Beddow ME, Savabi M, Katukuri VR, Mozurkewich EL, Chao CR.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2018 May; 131(5):835-841. PubMed ID: 29630011
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparing fetal biometric growth velocity versus estimated fetal weight for prediction of neonatal small for gestational age.
    Price CR, Roeckner J, Odibo L, Odibo A.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Oct; 35(20):3931-3936. PubMed ID: 33172312
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Diagnostic accuracy of individual antenatal tools for prediction of small-for-gestational age at birth.
    Poljak B, Agarwal U, Jackson R, Alfirevic Z, Sharp A.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Apr; 49(4):493-499. PubMed ID: 27486031
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Two-stage approach for prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonate and adverse perinatal outcome by routine ultrasound examination at 35-37 weeks' gestation.
    Akolekar R, Panaitescu AM, Ciobanu A, Syngelaki A, Nicolaides KH.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 54(4):484-491. PubMed ID: 31271475
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparing the relation between ultrasound-estimated fetal weight and birthweight in cohort of small-for-gestational-age fetuses.
    Stephens K, Al-Memar M, Beattie-Jones S, Dhanjal M, Mappouridou S, Thorne E, Lees C.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Nov; 98(11):1435-1441. PubMed ID: 31090917
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome by fetal biometry: comparison of customized and population-based standards.
    Kabiri D, Romero R, Gudicha DW, Hernandez-Andrade E, Pacora P, Benshalom-Tirosh N, Tirosh D, Yeo L, Erez O, Hassan SS, Tarca AL.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 55(2):177-188. PubMed ID: 31006913
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of estimated fetal weight percentiles near term for predicting extremes of birthweight percentile.
    Sovio U, Smith GCS.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 224(3):292.e1-292.e19. PubMed ID: 32835717
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates at 35-37 weeks' gestation: contribution of maternal factors and growth velocity between 20 and 36 weeks.
    Ciobanu A, Formuso C, Syngelaki A, Akolekar R, Nicolaides KH.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Apr; 53(4):488-495. PubMed ID: 30779239
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Fetal growth restriction and small for gestational age as predictors of neonatal morbidity: which growth nomogram to use?
    Leon-Martinez D, Lundsberg LS, Culhane J, Zhang J, Son M, Reddy UM.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Dec; 229(6):678.e1-678.e16. PubMed ID: 37348779
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Prenatal prediction of small-for-gestational age neonates using MR imaging: comparison with conventional 2D ultrasound.
    Carlin A, Kadji C, De Angelis R, Cannie MM, Jani JC.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 May; 32(10):1673-1681. PubMed ID: 29212395
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparing INTERGROWTH-21st Century and Hadlock growth standards to predict small for gestational age and short-term neonatal outcomes.
    Nwabuobi C, Odibo L, Camisasca-Lopina H, Leavitt K, Tuuli M, Odibo AO.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Jun; 33(11):1906-1912. PubMed ID: 30614334
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Prediction of large-for-gestational-age neonate by routine third-trimester ultrasound.
    Khan N, Ciobanu A, Karampitsakos T, Akolekar R, Nicolaides KH.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Sep; 54(3):326-333. PubMed ID: 31236963
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A Comparison of Prediction of Adverse Perinatal Outcomes between Hadlock and INTERGROWTH-21st Standards at the Third Trimester.
    Zhu C, Ren YY, Wu JN, Zhou QJ.
    Biomed Res Int; 2019 Sep; 2019():7698038. PubMed ID: 30729130
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates at 35-37 weeks' gestation: contribution of maternal factors and growth velocity between 32 and 36 weeks.
    Ciobanu A, Anthoulakis C, Syngelaki A, Akolekar R, Nicolaides KH.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 May; 53(5):630-637. PubMed ID: 30912210
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Significance and Outcomes of Fetal Growth Restriction Below the 5th Percentile Compared to the 5th to 10th Percentiles on Midgestation Growth Ultrasonography.
    Zhang-Rutledge K, Mack LM, Mastrobattista JM, Gandhi M.
    J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Sep; 37(9):2243-2249. PubMed ID: 29476559
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 23.