These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

919 related items for PubMed ID: 30246567

  • 1. Goldmann applanation tonometer versus ocular response analyzer for measuring intraocular pressure after congenital cataract surgery.
    Feizi S, Faramarzi A, Kheiri B.
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 28(5):582-589. PubMed ID: 30246567
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties using an ocular response analyser to examine aphakic and pseudophakic patients after congenital cataract surgery.
    Simsek T, Soba DO, Tırhış MH, Yılmazbaş P, Öztürk F.
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 May; 94(3):e198-203. PubMed ID: 26521752
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Goldmann Applanation Tonometer Versus Ocular Response Analyzer for Measuring Intraocular Pressure After Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty.
    Feizi S, Faramarzi A, Masoudi A, Azari AA, Veisi A.
    Cornea; 2018 Nov; 37(11):1370-1375. PubMed ID: 29877927
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure differences between an air-puff tonometer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer.
    Tranchina L, Lombardo M, Oddone F, Serrao S, Schiano Lomoriello D, Ducoli P.
    J Glaucoma; 2013 Nov; 22(5):416-21. PubMed ID: 22366703
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement between rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in treated glaucoma patients.
    Vincent SJ, Vincent RA, Shields D, Lee GA.
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2012 Nov; 40(4):e163-70. PubMed ID: 21883774
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effect of corneal parameters on measurements using the pulsatile ocular blood flow tonograph and Goldmann applanation tonometer.
    Gunvant P, Baskaran M, Vijaya L, Joseph IS, Watkins RJ, Nallapothula M, Broadway DC, O'Leary DJ.
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2004 Apr; 88(4):518-22. PubMed ID: 15031169
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Measurement of the intraocular pressure with the "transpalpebral tonometer" TGDc-01 in comparison with applanation tonometry.
    Sandner D, Böhm A, Kostov S, Pillunat L.
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2005 Jun; 243(6):563-9. PubMed ID: 15614540
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Corneal hysteresis and intraocular pressure measurement in children using the reichert ocular response analyzer.
    Kirwan C, O'Keefe M, Lanigan B.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Dec; 142(6):990-2. PubMed ID: 17157583
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Intraocular pressure measurement-comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Schneider E, Grehn F.
    J Glaucoma; 2006 Feb; 15(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 16378009
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 46.