These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

396 related items for PubMed ID: 30255807

  • 1. Energy storing and return prosthetic feet improve step length symmetry while preserving margins of stability in persons with transtibial amputation.
    Houdijk H, Wezenberg D, Hak L, Cutti AG.
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Sep 05; 15(Suppl 1):76. PubMed ID: 30255807
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of the International Committee of the Red Cross foot with the solid ankle cushion heel foot during gait: a randomized double-blind study.
    Turcot K, Sagawa Y, Lacraz A, Lenoir J, Assal M, Armand S.
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2013 Aug 05; 94(8):1490-7. PubMed ID: 23578592
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Benefits of an increased prosthetic ankle range of motion for individuals with a trans-tibial amputation walking with a new prosthetic foot.
    Heitzmann DWW, Salami F, De Asha AR, Block J, Putz C, Wolf SI, Alimusaj M.
    Gait Posture; 2018 Jul 05; 64():174-180. PubMed ID: 29913354
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison between microprocessor-controlled ankle/foot and conventional prosthetic feet during stair negotiation in people with unilateral transtibial amputation.
    Agrawal V, Gailey RS, Gaunaurd IA, O'Toole C, Finnieston AA.
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2013 Jul 05; 50(7):941-50. PubMed ID: 24301431
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of four different categories of prosthetic feet during ramp ambulation in unilateral transtibial amputees.
    Agrawal V, Gailey RS, Gaunaurd IA, O'Toole C, Finnieston A, Tolchin R.
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2015 Oct 05; 39(5):380-9. PubMed ID: 24925671
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The effects of a controlled energy storage and return prototype prosthetic foot on transtibial amputee ambulation.
    Segal AD, Zelik KE, Klute GK, Morgenroth DC, Hahn ME, Orendurff MS, Adamczyk PG, Collins SH, Kuo AD, Czerniecki JM.
    Hum Mov Sci; 2012 Aug 05; 31(4):918-31. PubMed ID: 22100728
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Biomechanical comparison of the energy-storing capabilities of SACH and Carbon Copy II prosthetic feet during the stance phase of gait in a person with below-knee amputation.
    Barr AE, Siegel KL, Danoff JV, McGarvey CL, Tomasko A, Sable I, Stanhope SJ.
    Phys Ther; 1992 May 05; 72(5):344-54. PubMed ID: 1631203
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Joint moment and muscle power output characteristics of below knee amputees during running: the influence of energy storing prosthetic feet.
    Czerniecki JM, Gitter A, Munro C.
    J Biomech; 1991 May 05; 24(1):63-75. PubMed ID: 2026634
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The effects of prosthetic foot type and visual alteration on postural steadiness in below-knee amputees.
    Arifin N, Abu Osman NA, Ali S, Wan Abas WA.
    Biomed Eng Online; 2014 Mar 05; 13(1):23. PubMed ID: 24597518
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.