These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


347 related items for PubMed ID: 30285807

  • 21. Prospective, Randomized Comparison of Cervical Total Disk Replacement Versus Anterior Cervical Fusion: Results at 48 Months Follow-up.
    Hisey MS, Bae HW, Davis RJ, Gaede S, Hoffman G, Kim KD, Nunley PD, Peterson D, Rashbaum RF, Stokes J, Ohnmeiss DD.
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 May; 28(4):E237-43. PubMed ID: 25310394
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Incidence of Symptomatic Adjacent Segment Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Zhu Y, Zhang B, Liu H, Wu Y, Zhu Q.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Oct 01; 41(19):1493-1502. PubMed ID: 26926472
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Factors affecting reoperations after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion within and outside of a Federal Drug Administration investigational device exemption cervical disc replacement trial.
    Singh K, Phillips FM, Park DK, Pelton MA, An HS, Goldberg EJ.
    Spine J; 2012 May 01; 12(5):372-8. PubMed ID: 22425784
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Segmental Motion of the Cervical Spine After Total Disc Replacement Using ActivC Versus Discectomy and Fusion Using Stand-alone Cage.
    Kim BJ, Kim SH, Lee SH, Ha SK, Kim SD, Lim DJ.
    World Neurosurg; 2019 Jun 01; 126():e1228-e1234. PubMed ID: 30885861
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. The segmental distribution of cervical range of motion: A comparison of ACDF versus TDR-C.
    Chang SW, Bohl MA, Kelly BP, Wade C.
    J Clin Neurosci; 2018 Nov 01; 57():185-193. PubMed ID: 30197057
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Efficacy and safety of Mobi-C cervical artificial disc versus anterior discectomy and fusion in patients with symptomatic degenerative disc disease: A meta-analysis.
    Lu H, Peng L.
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Dec 01; 96(49):e8504. PubMed ID: 29245217
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Comparison of Multilevel Cervical Disc Replacement and Multilevel Anterior Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review of Biomechanical and Clinical Evidence.
    Li Y, Shen H, Khan KZ, Fang S, Liao Z, Liu W.
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Aug 01; 116():94-104. PubMed ID: 29753897
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.