These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

322 related items for PubMed ID: 30287705

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A comparative histological analysis of human pulp following direct pulp capping with Propolis, mineral trioxide aggregate and Dycal.
    Parolia A, Kundabala M, Rao NN, Acharya SR, Agrawal P, Mohan M, Thomas M.
    Aust Dent J; 2010 Mar; 55(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 20415913
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Identification of hierarchical factors to guide clinical decision making for successful long-term pulp capping.
    Murray PE, Hafez AA, Smith AJ, Cox CF.
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 12674361
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Pulpal response to a resin-modified glass-ionomer material on nonexposed and exposed monkey pulps.
    Tarim B, Hafez AA, Cox CF.
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Aug; 29(8):535-42. PubMed ID: 9807135
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Histopathology study on pulp response to glass ionomers in human teeth.
    Mousavinasab M, Namazikhah MS, Sarabi N, Jajarm HH, Bidar M, Ghavamnasiri M.
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2008 Jan; 36(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 18293762
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparative Analysis of Biodentine, Calcium Hydroxide, and 2% Chlorhexidine with Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement as Indirect Pulp Capping Materials in Young Permanent Molars.
    Kaul S, Kumar A, Jasrotia A, Gorkha K, Kumari S, Jeri SY.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 May 01; 22(5):511-516. PubMed ID: 34318769
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Human pulp response to conventional and resin-modified glass ionomer cements applied in very deep cavities.
    Ribeiro APD, Sacono NT, Soares DG, Bordini EAF, de Souza Costa CA, Hebling J.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 May 01; 24(5):1739-1748. PubMed ID: 31372829
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Effect of conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer liner on dentin adhesive interface of Class I cavity walls after thermocycling.
    Sampaio PC, de Almeida Júnior AA, Francisconi LF, Casas-Apayco LC, Pereira JC, Wang L, Atta MT.
    Oper Dent; 2011 May 01; 36(4):403-12. PubMed ID: 21913841
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V, Singla M, Yadav S, Yadav H.
    J Dent; 2014 May 01; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.