These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
716 related items for PubMed ID: 30298532
1. Maternal and perinatal outcomes after elective induction of labor at 39 weeks in uncomplicated singleton pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Sotiriadis A, Petousis S, Thilaganathan B, Figueras F, Martins WP, Odibo AO, Dinas K, Hyett J. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jan; 53(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 30298532 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor. Caughey AB, Sundaram V, Kaimal AJ, Cheng YW, Gienger A, Little SE, Lee JF, Wong L, Shaffer BL, Tran SH, Padula A, McDonald KM, Long EF, Owens DK, Bravata DM. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep); 2009 Mar; (176):1-257. PubMed ID: 19408970 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Maternal and newborn outcomes with elective induction of labor at term. Souter V, Painter I, Sitcov K, Caughey AB. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 220(3):273.e1-273.e11. PubMed ID: 30716284 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks compared with expectant management: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Grobman WA, Caughey AB. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 221(4):304-310. PubMed ID: 30817905 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Maternal Labor-Related Complications and Neonatal Outcomes Following Elective Induction of Labor at 39 Weeks of Gestation vs Expectant Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Hong J, Atkinson J, Roddy Mitchell A, Tong S, Walker SP, Middleton A, Lindquist A, Hastie R. JAMA Netw Open; 2023 May 01; 6(5):e2313162. PubMed ID: 37171818 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of induction of labor prior to post-term in low-risk pregnancies: a systematic review. Rydahl E, Eriksen L, Juhl M. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2019 Feb 01; 17(2):170-208. PubMed ID: 30299344 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Induction of labor versus expectant management for post-date pregnancy: is there sufficient evidence for a change in clinical practice? Wennerholm UB, Hagberg H, Brorsson B, Bergh C. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009 Feb 01; 88(1):6-17. PubMed ID: 19140042 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Nonmedically indicated induction in morbidly obese women is not associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery. Kawakita T, Iqbal SN, Huang CC, Reddy UM. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct 01; 217(4):451.e1-451.e8. PubMed ID: 28578171 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Does induction of labor at term increase the risk of cesarean section in advanced maternal age? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Fonseca MJ, Santos F, Afreixo V, Silva IS, Almeida MDC. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Oct 01; 253():213-219. PubMed ID: 32889327 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [To the question of elective induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation, the answer lies in the question]. Rozenberg P. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2018 May 01; 46(5):481-488. PubMed ID: 29656952 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Association between timing of labor induction and neonatal and maternal outcomes: an observational study from China. Hu Y, Chen B, Wang X, Zhu S, Bao S, Lu J, Wang L, Wang W, Wu C, Qi L, Wang Y, Li F, Xie W, Wu Y, Hu L, Xia Y, Lou B, Guo R, Xie B, Chen X, Han Y, Chen D, Ma H, Liang Z. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2024 Oct 01; 6(10):101456. PubMed ID: 39151749 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study. Stock SJ, Ferguson E, Duffy A, Ford I, Chalmers J, Norman JE. BMJ; 2012 May 10; 344():e2838. PubMed ID: 22577197 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]