These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

200 related items for PubMed ID: 30334983

  • 1. Safety and efficacy of AAIR pacing in selected patients with sick sinus syndrome.
    Senaratne J, Herath TT, Beaudette D, Irwin M, Gulamhusein S, Senaratne MP.
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Oct; 97(42):e12833. PubMed ID: 30334983
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A comparison of AAIR versus DDDR pacing for patients with sinus node dysfunction: a long-term follow-up study.
    Mutagaywa RK, Tumaini B, Chin A.
    Cardiovasc J Afr; 2018 Oct; 32(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 32946543
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Single lead atrial vs. dual chamber pacing in sick sinus syndrome: extended register-based follow-up in the DANPACE trial.
    Brandt NH, Kirkfeldt RE, Nielsen JC, Mortensen LS, Jensen GVH, Johansen JB, Haugan K.
    Europace; 2017 Dec 01; 19(12):1981-1987. PubMed ID: 28039212
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Incidence of atrial fibrillation and thromboembolism in a randomised trial of atrial versus dual chamber pacing in 177 patients with sick sinus syndrome.
    Kristensen L, Nielsen JC, Mortensen PT, Pedersen OL, Pedersen AK, Andersen HR.
    Heart; 2004 Jun 01; 90(6):661-6. PubMed ID: 15145874
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A comparison of single-lead atrial pacing with dual-chamber pacing in sick sinus syndrome.
    Nielsen JC, Thomsen PE, Højberg S, Møller M, Vesterlund T, Dalsgaard D, Mortensen LS, Nielsen T, Asklund M, Friis EV, Christensen PD, Simonsen EH, Eriksen UH, Jensen GV, Svendsen JH, Toff WD, Healey JS, Andersen HR, DANPACE Investigators.
    Eur Heart J; 2011 Mar 01; 32(6):686-96. PubMed ID: 21300730
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. AV block and changes in pacing mode during long-term follow-up of 399 consecutive patients with sick sinus syndrome treated with an AAI/AAIR pacemaker.
    Kristensen L, Nielsen JC, Pedersen AK, Mortensen PT, Andersen HR.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Mar 01; 24(3):358-65. PubMed ID: 11310306
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Rate adaptive pacing in sick sinus syndrome: effects of pacing modes and intrinsic conduction on physiological responses, arrhythmias, symptomatology and quality of life.
    Lau CP, Tai YT, Leung WH, Wong CK, Lee P, Chung FL.
    Eur Heart J; 1994 Nov 01; 15(11):1445-55. PubMed ID: 7835358
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Pacing mode survival in patients with single chamber atrial pacemaker for sinus node dysfunction.
    Velayuthan R, Sukumar SK, Bootla D, Balaguru S, Anantharaj A, Satheesh S, Selvaraj RJ.
    Indian Heart J; 2024 Nov 01; 76(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 38070672
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Dual-chamber pacemakers for treating symptomatic bradycardia due to sick sinus syndrome without atrioventricular block: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Edwards SJ, Karner C, Trevor N, Wakefield V, Salih F.
    Health Technol Assess; 2015 Aug 01; 19(65):1-210. PubMed ID: 26293406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Atrial demand pacemakers in sick sinus syndrome: an efficient and reliable approach in selected patients.
    Liang KW, Lee WL, Hsueh CW, Chen YT, Ting CT.
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2003 Dec 01; 66(12):709-14. PubMed ID: 15015819
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. AAIR versus DDDR pacing in the bradycardia tachycardia syndrome: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, crossover trial.
    Schwaab B, Kindermann M, Schätzer-Klotz D, Berg M, Franow H, Fröhlig G, Schieffer H.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Nov 01; 24(11):1585-95. PubMed ID: 11816626
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A randomized comparison of atrial and dual-chamber pacing in 177 consecutive patients with sick sinus syndrome: echocardiographic and clinical outcome.
    Nielsen JC, Kristensen L, Andersen HR, Mortensen PT, Pedersen OL, Pedersen AK.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2003 Aug 20; 42(4):614-23. PubMed ID: 12932590
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. System upgrade and its complications in patients with a single lead atrial pacemaker: data from the DANPACE trial.
    Kirkfeldt RE, Andersen HR, Nielsen JC, DANPACE Investigators.
    Europace; 2013 Aug 20; 15(8):1166-73. PubMed ID: 23449923
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Long-term survival of chosen atrial-based pacing modalities.
    Irwin M, Carbol B, Senaratne M, Gulamhusein S.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov 20; 19(11 Pt 2):1796-8. PubMed ID: 8945043
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Natural history of sinus node disease treated with atrial pacing in 213 patients: implications for selection of stimulation mode.
    Brandt J, Anderson H, Fåhraeus T, Schüller H.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1992 Sep 20; 20(3):633-9. PubMed ID: 1512343
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Does atrial pacing lead to atrial fibrillation in patients with sick sinus syndrome? Insights from the DANPACE trial.
    Hjortshøj S, Riahi S, Nielsen JC, Skjøth F, Lundbye-Christensen S, Andersen HR, DANPACE Investigators.
    Europace; 2014 Feb 20; 16(2):241-5. PubMed ID: 24169735
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Effective Management of Atrioventricular Interval for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation That Developed After DDDR Pacemaker Implantation in a Sick Sinus Syndrome Patient.
    Tasaki H, Ashizawa N, Nagao S, Fukushima K, Furukawa R, Fukae S, Maemura K.
    Int Heart J; 2015 Feb 20; 56(5):558-63. PubMed ID: 26370366
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. AAIR versus DDDR pacing in patients with impaired sinus node chronotropy: an echocardiographic and cardiopulmonary study.
    Vardas PE, Simantirakis EN, Parthenakis FI, Chrysostomakis SI, Skalidis EI, Zuridakis EG.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Jul 20; 20(7):1762-8. PubMed ID: 9249829
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Effect of PR interval and pacing mode on persistent atrial fibrillation incidence in dual chamber pacemaker patients: a sub-study of the international randomized MINERVA trial.
    Boriani G, Pieragnoli P, Botto GL, Puererfellner H, Mont L, Ziacchi M, Manolis AS, Gulizia M, Tukkie R, Landolina M, Ricciardi G, Cicconelli M, Grammatico A, Biffi M.
    Europace; 2019 Apr 01; 21(4):636-644. PubMed ID: 30649270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Dual chamber versus single chamber ventricular pacemakers for sick sinus syndrome and atrioventricular block.
    Dretzke J, Toff WD, Lip GY, Raftery J, Fry-Smith A, Taylor R.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004 Apr 01; 2004(2):CD003710. PubMed ID: 15106214
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.