These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


463 related items for PubMed ID: 30343096

  • 1. Inhibitory mechanisms involved in Stroop-matching and stop-signal tasks and the role of impulsivity.
    Portugal ACA, Afonso AS, Caldas AL, Maturana W, Mocaiber I, Machado-Pinheiro W.
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Nov; 191():234-243. PubMed ID: 30343096
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Associations between trait impulsivity and prepotent response inhibition.
    Aichert DS, Wöstmann NM, Costa A, Macare C, Wenig JR, Möller HJ, Rubia K, Ettinger U.
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2012 Nov; 34(10):1016-32. PubMed ID: 22888795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Interference scores have inadequate concurrent and convergent validity: Should we stop using the flanker, Simon, and spatial Stroop tasks?
    Paap KR, Anders-Jefferson R, Zimiga B, Mason L, Mikulinsky R.
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 Feb 13; 5(1):7. PubMed ID: 32056032
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Response inhibition and interference control: Effects of schizophrenia, genetic risk, and schizotypy.
    Ettinger U, Aichert DS, Wöstmann N, Dehning S, Riedel M, Kumari V.
    J Neuropsychol; 2018 Sep 13; 12(3):484-510. PubMed ID: 28485076
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Differential relationships between sub-traits of BIS-11 impulsivity and executive processes: an ERP study.
    Kam JW, Dominelli R, Carlson SR.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Aug 13; 85(2):174-87. PubMed ID: 22659220
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Virtual Apartment-Based Stroop for assessing distractor inhibition in healthy aging.
    Parsons TD, Barnett M.
    Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2019 Aug 13; 26(2):144-154. PubMed ID: 28976213
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Slow and steady? Strategic adjustments in response caution are moderately reliable and correlate across tasks.
    Hedge C, Vivian-Griffiths S, Powell G, Bompas A, Sumner P.
    Conscious Cogn; 2019 Oct 13; 75():102797. PubMed ID: 31421398
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The role of trait impulsivity in response inhibition: event-related potentials in a stop-signal task.
    Shen IH, Lee DS, Chen CL.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Feb 13; 91(2):80-7. PubMed ID: 24316151
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Conduct problems in adolescence: three domains of inhibition and effect of gender.
    Herba CM, Tranah T, Rubia K, Yule W.
    Dev Neuropsychol; 2006 Feb 13; 30(2):659-95. PubMed ID: 16995831
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Enhancing decision-making and cognitive impulse control with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied over the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC): A randomized and sham-controlled exploratory study.
    Ouellet J, McGirr A, Van den Eynde F, Jollant F, Lepage M, Berlim MT.
    J Psychiatr Res; 2015 Oct 13; 69():27-34. PubMed ID: 26343591
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Individual but not fragile: individual differences in task control predict Stroop facilitation.
    Kalanthroff E, Henik A.
    Conscious Cogn; 2013 Jun 13; 22(2):413-9. PubMed ID: 23416541
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Response inhibition in the parametric go/no-go task and its relation to impulsivity and subclinical psychopathy.
    Weidacker K, Whiteford S, Boy F, Johnston SJ.
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Mar 13; 70(3):473-487. PubMed ID: 26821562
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The Stroop-matching task as a tool to study the correspondence effect using images of graspable and non-graspable objects.
    Caldas AL, Machado-Pinheiro W, Daneyko O, Riggio L.
    Psychol Res; 2020 Oct 13; 84(7):1815-1828. PubMed ID: 31030272
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The relationship between Stroop and stop-signal measures of inhibition in adolescents: influences from variations in context and measure estimation.
    Khng KH, Lee K.
    PLoS One; 2014 Oct 13; 9(7):e101356. PubMed ID: 24992683
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Prepotent motor activity and inhibitory control demands in different variants of the go/no-go paradigm.
    Wessel JR.
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Mar 13; 55(3):. PubMed ID: 28390090
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Cognitive and behavioural dispositions in offspring at high risk for alcoholism.
    Kumar R, Kumar KJ, Benegal V.
    Asian J Psychiatr; 2018 Jun 13; 35():38-44. PubMed ID: 29775836
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Impulsivity in adult ADHD patients with and without cocaine dependence.
    Crunelle CL, Veltman DJ, van Emmerik-van Oortmerssen K, Booij J, van den Brink W.
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2013 Apr 01; 129(1-2):18-24. PubMed ID: 23026814
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The Right Superior Frontal Gyrus and Individual Variation in Proactive Control of Impulsive Response.
    Hu S, Ide JS, Zhang S, Li CR.
    J Neurosci; 2016 Dec 14; 36(50):12688-12696. PubMed ID: 27974616
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effects of sleep loss and circadian rhythm on executive inhibitory control in the Stroop and Simon tasks.
    Bratzke D, Steinborn MB, Rolke B, Ulrich R.
    Chronobiol Int; 2012 Feb 14; 29(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 22217101
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 24.