These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

221 related items for PubMed ID: 30370884

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Slim, Modiolar Cochlear Implant Electrode: Melbourne Experience and Comparison With the Contour Perimodiolar Electrode.
    Shaul C, Weder S, Tari S, Gerard JM, O'Leary SJ, Briggs RJ.
    Otol Neurotol; 2020 Jun; 41(5):639-643. PubMed ID: 32150026
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Evaluation After Cochlear Implant Surgery : Correlation of Clinical Outcome and Imaging Findings using Flat-detector CT.
    Stock A, Bozzato V, Kloska SP, Bozzato A, Hoppe U, Hornung J, Dörfler A, Struffert T.
    Clin Neuroradiol; 2021 Jun; 31(2):367-372. PubMed ID: 32556392
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Role of electrode placement as a contributor to variability in cochlear implant outcomes.
    Finley CC, Holden TA, Holden LK, Whiting BR, Chole RA, Neely GJ, Hullar TE, Skinner MW.
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Oct; 29(7):920-8. PubMed ID: 18667935
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Electrode Translocations in Perimodiolar Cochlear Implant Electrodes: Audiological and Electrophysiological Outcome.
    Liebscher T, Mewes A, Hoppe U, Hornung J, Brademann G, Hey M.
    Z Med Phys; 2021 Aug; 31(3):265-275. PubMed ID: 32620321
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Quality control after insertion of the nucleus contour and contour advance electrode in adults.
    Aschendorff A, Kromeier J, Klenzner T, Laszig R.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):75S-79S. PubMed ID: 17496653
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Early Outcomes With a Slim, Modiolar Cochlear Implant Electrode Array.
    McJunkin JL, Durakovic N, Herzog J, Buchman CA.
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Jan; 39(1):e28-e33. PubMed ID: 29227449
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Electrode Location and Audiologic Performance After Cochlear Implantation: A Comparative Study Between Nucleus CI422 and CI512 Electrode Arrays.
    O'Connell BP, Hunter JB, Gifford RH, Rivas A, Haynes DS, Noble JH, Wanna GB.
    Otol Neurotol; 2016 Sep; 37(8):1032-5. PubMed ID: 27525618
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Nucleus multichannel cochlear implantation in partially ossified cochleas using the Steenerson procedure.
    Bacciu S, Bacciu A, Pasanisi E, Vincenti V, Guida M, Barbot A, Berghenti T.
    Otol Neurotol; 2002 May; 23(3):341-5. PubMed ID: 11981392
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Midmodiolar reconstruction as a valuable tool to determine the exact position of the cochlear implant electrode array.
    Lecerf P, Bakhos D, Cottier JP, Lescanne E, Trijolet JP, Robier A.
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Sep; 32(7):1075-81. PubMed ID: 21817940
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Scala vestibuli insertion in cochlear implantation: a valuable alternative for cases with obstructed scala tympani.
    Kiefer J, Weber A, Pfennigdorff T, von Ilberg C.
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2000 Sep; 62(5):251-6. PubMed ID: 10965260
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The influence of cochlear morphology on the final electrode array position.
    Ketterer MC, Aschendorff A, Arndt S, Hassepass F, Wesarg T, Laszig R, Beck R.
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Feb; 275(2):385-394. PubMed ID: 29242990
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Scalar localization by cone-beam computed tomography of cochlear implant carriers: a comparative study between straight and periomodiolar precurved electrode arrays.
    Boyer E, Karkas A, Attye A, Lefournier V, Escude B, Schmerber S.
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Mar; 36(3):422-9. PubMed ID: 25575374
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Insertion depth impacts speech perception and hearing preservation for lateral wall electrodes.
    O'Connell BP, Hunter JB, Haynes DS, Holder JT, Dedmon MM, Noble JH, Dawant BM, Wanna GB.
    Laryngoscope; 2017 Oct; 127(10):2352-2357. PubMed ID: 28304096
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Cochlear implantation with the nucleus slim modiolar electrode (CI532): a preliminary experience.
    Cuda D, Murri A.
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Dec; 274(12):4141-4148. PubMed ID: 29032420
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Scalar Translocation Comparison Between Lateral Wall and Perimodiolar Cochlear Implant Arrays - A Meta-Analysis.
    Jwair S, Prins A, Wegner I, Stokroos RJ, Versnel H, Thomeer HGXM.
    Laryngoscope; 2021 Jun; 131(6):1358-1368. PubMed ID: 33159469
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Evaluation of insertion quality of a slim perimodiolar electrode array.
    Beck R, Aschendorff A, Arndt S, Hildenbrand T, Rauch AK, Ketterer MC.
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Mar; 281(3):1215-1220. PubMed ID: 37773530
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Quality control after cochlear implant surgery by means of rotational tomography.
    Aschendorff A, Kubalek R, Turowski B, Zanella F, Hochmuth A, Schumacher M, Klenzner T, Laszig R.
    Otol Neurotol; 2005 Jan; 26(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 15699717
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.