These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

524 related items for PubMed ID: 30390544

  • 1. GPCR homology model template selection benchmarking: Global versus local similarity measures.
    Castleman PN, Sears CK, Cole JA, Baker DL, Parrill AL.
    J Mol Graph Model; 2019 Jan; 86():235-246. PubMed ID: 30390544
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Benchmarking GPCR homology model template selection in combination with de novo loop generation.
    Szwabowski GL, Castleman PN, Sears CK, Wink LH, Cole JA, Baker DL, Parrill AL.
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Oct; 34(10):1027-1044. PubMed ID: 32737667
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Assessing GPCR homology models constructed from templates of various transmembrane sequence identities: Binding mode prediction and docking enrichment.
    Loo JSE, Emtage AL, Ng KW, Yong ASJ, Doughty SW.
    J Mol Graph Model; 2018 Mar; 80():38-47. PubMed ID: 29306746
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Template selection and refinement considerations for modelling aminergic GPCR-ligand complexes.
    Urmi KF, Finch AM, Griffith R.
    J Mol Graph Model; 2017 Sep; 76():488-503. PubMed ID: 28818718
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Self-docking and cross-docking simulations of G protein-coupled receptor-ligand complexes: Impact of ligand type and receptor activation state.
    Thomas BN, Parrill AL, Baker DL.
    J Mol Graph Model; 2022 May; 112():108119. PubMed ID: 34979368
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Homology modeling of G-protein-coupled receptors with X-ray structures on the rise.
    Yarnitzky T, Levit A, Niv MY.
    Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2010 May; 13(3):317-25. PubMed ID: 20443165
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Performance of virtual screening against GPCR homology models: Impact of template selection and treatment of binding site plasticity.
    Jaiteh M, Rodríguez-Espigares I, Selent J, Carlsson J.
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2020 Mar; 16(3):e1007680. PubMed ID: 32168319
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Ligand-steered modeling and docking: A benchmarking study in class A G-protein-coupled receptors.
    Phatak SS, Gatica EA, Cavasotto CN.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Dec 27; 50(12):2119-28. PubMed ID: 21080692
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Assessment and challenges of ligand docking into comparative models of G-protein coupled receptors.
    Nguyen ED, Norn C, Frimurer TM, Meiler J.
    PLoS One; 2013 Dec 27; 8(7):e67302. PubMed ID: 23844000
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Improving virtual screening of G protein-coupled receptors via ligand-directed modeling.
    Coudrat T, Simms J, Christopoulos A, Wootten D, Sexton PM.
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Nov 27; 13(11):e1005819. PubMed ID: 29131821
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 27.