These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

203 related items for PubMed ID: 30392653

  • 1. Clearsight™ use for haemodynamic monitoring during the third trimester of pregnancy - a validation study.
    Duclos G, Hili A, Resseguier N, Kelway C, Haddam M, Bourgoin A, Carcopino X, Zieleskiewicz L, Leone M.
    Int J Obstet Anesth; 2018 Nov; 36():85-95. PubMed ID: 30392653
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Accuracy of the ClearSight™ system in patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery.
    Sumiyoshi M, Maeda T, Miyazaki E, Hotta N, Sato H, Hamaguchi E, Kanazawa H, Ohnishi Y, Kamei M.
    J Anesth; 2019 Jun; 33(3):364-371. PubMed ID: 30904953
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Cardiac output assessment in pregnancy: comparison of two automated monitors with echocardiography.
    Vinayagam D, Patey O, Thilaganathan B, Khalil A.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 49(1):32-38. PubMed ID: 26970353
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Clinical validation of bioreactance for the measurement of cardiac output in pregnancy.
    Ling HZ, Gallardo-Arozena M, Company-Calabuig AM, Nicolaides KH, Kametas NA.
    Anaesthesia; 2020 Oct; 75(10):1307-1313. PubMed ID: 32469423
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Agreement between preload reserve measured by impedance cardiography and echocardiography during pregnancy.
    Liang H, Vårtun Å, Acharya G.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Jul; 298(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 29623416
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Non-invasive continuous haemodynamic monitoring and response to intervention in haemodynamically unstable patients during rapid response team review.
    Eyeington CT, Lloyd-Donald P, Chan MJ, Eastwood GM, Young H, Peck L, Marhoon N, Jones DA, Bellomo R.
    Resuscitation; 2019 Oct; 143():124-133. PubMed ID: 31446156
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Cardiac Output Measurement in Neonates and Children Using Noninvasive Electrical Bioimpedance Compared With Standard Methods: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Mansfield RC, Kaza N, Charalambous A, Milne AC, Sathiyamurthy S, Banerjee J.
    Crit Care Med; 2022 Jan 01; 50(1):126-137. PubMed ID: 34325447
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Transthoracic echocardiography: an accurate and precise method for estimating cardiac output in the critically ill patient.
    Mercado P, Maizel J, Beyls C, Titeca-Beauport D, Joris M, Kontar L, Riviere A, Bonef O, Soupison T, Tribouilloy C, de Cagny B, Slama M.
    Crit Care; 2017 Jun 09; 21(1):136. PubMed ID: 28595621
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Continuous non-invasive measurement of stroke volume and cardiac index in infants and children: comparison of Impedance Cardiography NICaS® vs CardioQ® method.
    Beck R, Milella L, Labellarte C.
    Clin Ter; 2018 Jun 09; 169(3):e110-e113. PubMed ID: 29938742
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Prediction of fluid responsiveness using a non-invasive cardiac output monitor in children undergoing cardiac surgery.
    Lee JH, No HJ, Song IK, Kim HS, Kim CS, Kim JT.
    Br J Anaesth; 2015 Jul 09; 115(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 25926311
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Accuracy and trending ability of finger plethysmographic cardiac output monitoring in late pregnancy.
    Bonnin P, Constans B, Duhamel A, Kyheng M, Ducloy-Bouthors AS, Estevez MG, Tavernier B, Gaudet A.
    Can J Anaesth; 2022 Nov 09; 69(11):1340-1348. PubMed ID: 35927539
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A validation study of electrical cardiometry in pregnant patients using transthoracic echocardiography as the reference standard.
    Martin E, Anyikam A, Ballas J, Buono K, Mantell K, Huynh-Covey T, Archer T.
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2016 Oct 09; 30(5):679-86. PubMed ID: 26403606
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Non-Invasive Haemodynamic Monitoring in Pregnancy: A Comparative Study Using Ultrasound and Bioreactance.
    Vinayagam D, Bowe S, Sheehan E, Thilaganathan B, Khalil A.
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2017 Oct 09; 41(4):273-282. PubMed ID: 27705969
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Cardiac Output and Stroke Volume Assessments by Transthoracic Echocardiography and Pulse index Continuous Cardiac Output Monitor in Critically ill Adult Patients: A Comparative Study.
    Gomes FKA, Fagundes AAP, Amorim FF.
    J Intensive Care Med; 2024 Apr 09; 39(4):341-348. PubMed ID: 37769347
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Ultrasound Cardiac Output Monitor (USCOM™) Measurements Prove Unreliable Compared to Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Adolescents with Cardiac Disease.
    Weissbach A, Rotstein A, Lakovsky Y, Kaplan E, Kadmon G, Birk E, Nahum E.
    Pediatr Cardiol; 2021 Mar 09; 42(3):692-699. PubMed ID: 33394105
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Clinical Validation of Non-Invasive Cardiac Output Monitoring in Healthy Pregnant Women.
    McLaughlin K, Wright SP, Kingdom JCP, Parker JD.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2017 Nov 09; 39(11):1008-1014. PubMed ID: 28733057
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Clinical study of neonatal cardiac output measurement methods].
    Zheng ML, Sun X, Zhong J, He SR, Pan W, Pang CC, Sun YX, Liu YM.
    Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Jan 09; 51(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 23527933
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Influence of maternal characteristics and gestational age on hemodynamic indices: NICOM device-specific reference ranges.
    Perry H, Stirrup O, Gutierrez J, Vinayagam D, Thilaganathan B, Khalil A.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Nov 09; 54(5):670-675. PubMed ID: 30548496
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.