These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

150 related items for PubMed ID: 30394992

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Vaginal versus robotic hysterectomy and concomitant pelvic support surgery: a comparison of postoperative vaginal length and sexual function.
    De La Cruz JF, Myers EM, Geller EJ.
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(6):1010-4. PubMed ID: 24780383
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Securing Mesh with Delayed Absorbable Suture Does Not Increase Risk of Prolapse Recurrence After Robotic Sacral Colpopexy.
    Powell CR, Tachibana I, Eckrich B, Rothenberg J, Hathaway J.
    J Endourol; 2021 Jun; 35(6):944-949. PubMed ID: 32037875
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Vaginal Uterosacral Ligament Suspension: A Retrospective Cohort of Absorbable and Permanent Suture Groups.
    Bradley MS, Bickhaus JA, Amundsen CL, Newcomb LK, Truong T, Weidner AC, Siddiqui NY.
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2018 Jun; 24(3):207-212. PubMed ID: 28657988
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Recurrence of vaginal prolapse after total vaginal hysterectomy with concurrent vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension: comparison between normal-weight and overweight women.
    Rappa C, Saccone G.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):601.e1-601.e4. PubMed ID: 27342042
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effect of Time of Year on Surgical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Sacral Colpopexy or Uterosacral Ligament Suspension.
    Renkosiak K, Bradley M, Dubinskaya A, Shepherd JP.
    Urogynecology (Phila); 2022 Sep 01; 28(9):561-566. PubMed ID: 35649240
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. National Analysis of Perioperative Morbidity of Vaginal Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy at the Time of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension.
    Chapman GC, Slopnick EA, Roberts K, Sheyn D, Wherley S, Mahajan ST, Pollard RR.
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Feb 01; 28(2):275-281. PubMed ID: 32450226
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension and sacral colpopexy: results and complications.
    Filmar GA, Fisher HW, Aranda E, Lotze PM.
    Int Urogynecol J; 2014 Dec 01; 25(12):1645-53. PubMed ID: 24819328
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy and a new approach to mesh fixation: a randomized clinical trial.
    Morciano A, Marzo G, Caliandro D, Campagna G, Panico G, Alcaino S, Bisanti T, Ercoli A, Romualdi D, Scambia G.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Nov 01; 298(5):939-944. PubMed ID: 30255345
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A novel transvaginal approach to correct recurrent apical prolapse after failed sacral colpopexy: case series.
    Bracken JN, Tran DH, Kuehl TJ, Larsen W, Yandell PM, Shull BL.
    Int Urogynecol J; 2012 Oct 01; 23(10):1429-33. PubMed ID: 22527557
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.