These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


913 related items for PubMed ID: 30427971

  • 1. Psychometric Analysis and Masticatory Efficiency of Elderly People with Single-Implant Overdentures.
    Amaral CF, Pinheiro MA, de Moraes M, Rodrigues Garcia RCM.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(6):1383-1389. PubMed ID: 30427971
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among middle-aged edentulous patients: satisfaction and functional assessment.
    Awad MA, Lund JP, Dufresne E, Feine JS.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 12737240
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Patient satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures 6 months after delivery.
    Thomason JM, Lund JP, Chehade A, Feine JS.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(5):467-73. PubMed ID: 14651229
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The influence of mandibular implant-retained overdentures in masticatory efficiency.
    Farias Neto A, Pereira BM, Xitara RL, Germano AR, Ribeiro JA, Mestriner Junior W, Carreiro Ada F.
    Gerodontology; 2012 Jun; 29(2):e650-5. PubMed ID: 21916952
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparative evaluation of masticatory efficiency, clinical performance, and patient satisfaction of single implant-retained mandibular overdenture versus conventional complete denture: A prospective in vivo study.
    Mathew JE, Kurian N, Gandhi N, Daniel AY, Roy N, Varghese KG.
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2024 Jan 01; 24(1):61-68. PubMed ID: 38263559
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Masticatory efficiency in complete denture and single implant-retained mandibular overdenture wearers with different occlusion schemes: A randomized clinical trial.
    Rocha COM, Longhini D, Pereira RP, Lima ALO, Bonafé FSS, Arioli Filho JN.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jun 01; 129(6):888-894. PubMed ID: 34517991
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Masticatory efficiency of implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with attachments compared with conventional dentures: an in vitro digital colorimetric image analysis.
    Salami ZA, Jasser EM, Makzoumé JED, Boulos PJA.
    Gen Dent; 2020 Jun 01; 68(6):60-64. PubMed ID: 33136048
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Evaluation of the Mean Bite Force and Masticatory Performance of Maxillary and Mandibular Complete Dentures vs Mandibular Implant-supported Over Denture.
    Kumar A, Karthik KVGC, Sunkala L, Bejagam V, Rathore KK, Rai P.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 May 01; 23(5):513-519. PubMed ID: 35986459
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The patient general satisfaction of mandibular single-implant overdentures and conventional complete dentures: Study protocol for a randomized crossover trial.
    Kanazawa M, Tanoue M, Miyayasu A, Takeshita S, Sato D, Asami M, Lam TV, Thu KM, Oda K, Komagamine Y, Minakuchi S, Feine J.
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 May 01; 97(20):e10721. PubMed ID: 29768340
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Within-subject comparison of maxillary long-bar implant-retained prostheses with and without palatal coverage: patient-based outcomes.
    de Albuquerque Júnior RF, Lund JP, Tang L, Larivée J, de Grandmont P, Gauthier G, Feine JS.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2000 Dec 01; 11(6):555-65. PubMed ID: 11168249
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Evaluation of masticatory performance and patient satisfaction for conventional and 3D-printed implant overdentures: a randomized crossover study.
    Nabil MS, Mahanna FF, Said MM.
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jun 08; 24(1):672. PubMed ID: 38851676
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. OHRQoL, masticatory performance and crestal bone loss with single-implant, magnet-retained mandibular overdentures with conventional and shortened dental arch.
    Grover M, Vaidyanathan AK, Veeravalli PT.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 May 08; 25(5):580-6. PubMed ID: 23331716
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Assessment of masticatory function of mandibular implant-supported overdenture wearers: A 3-year prospective study.
    Khalid T, Yunus N, Ibrahim N, Saleh NBM, Goode D, Masood M.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec 08; 124(6):674-681. PubMed ID: 31952858
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A within-subject comparison of mandibular long-bar and hybrid implant-supported prostheses: evaluation of masticatory function.
    Tang L, Lund JP, Taché R, Clokie CM, Feine JS.
    J Dent Res; 1999 Sep 08; 78(9):1544-53. PubMed ID: 10512389
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Improving masticatory performance, bite force, nutritional state and patient's satisfaction with implant overdentures: a systematic review of the literature.
    Boven GC, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, Meijer HJ.
    J Oral Rehabil; 2015 Mar 08; 42(3):220-33. PubMed ID: 25307515
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 46.