These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


311 related items for PubMed ID: 30460502

  • 1. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for adhesional small bowel obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies.
    Quah GS, Eslick GD, Cox MR.
    Surg Endosc; 2019 Oct; 33(10):3209-3217. PubMed ID: 30460502
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for acute small bowel obstruction: systematic review and pooled analysis.
    Wiggins T, Markar SR, Harris A.
    Surg Endosc; 2015 Dec; 29(12):3432-42. PubMed ID: 25840892
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Laparotomy for small-bowel obstruction: first choice or last resort for adhesiolysis? A laparoscopic approach for small-bowel obstruction reduces 30-day complications.
    Kelly KN, Iannuzzi JC, Rickles AS, Garimella V, Monson JR, Fleming FJ.
    Surg Endosc; 2014 Jan; 28(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 24002917
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Laparoscopic versus open surgical management of adhesive small bowel obstruction: a comparison of outcomes.
    Byrne J, Saleh F, Ambrosini L, Quereshy F, Jackson TD, Okrainec A.
    Surg Endosc; 2015 Sep; 29(9):2525-32. PubMed ID: 25480627
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The role of the laparoscopic approach in the surgical management of acute adhesive small bowel obstruction.
    Sebastian-Valverde E, Poves I, Membrilla-Fernández E, Pons-Fragero MJ, Grande L.
    BMC Surg; 2019 Apr 24; 19(1):40. PubMed ID: 31014318
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The impact of laparoscopy on emergency surgery for adhesional small bowel obstruction: prospective single centre cohort study.
    Darbyshire AR, Kostakis I, Pucher PH, Toh S, Mercer SJ.
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2021 Apr 24; 103(4):255-262. PubMed ID: 33682461
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Adhesive small bowel obstruction after appendectomy in children: comparison between the laparoscopic and open approach.
    Tsao KJ, St Peter SD, Valusek PA, Keckler SJ, Sharp S, Holcomb GW, Snyder CL, Ostlie DJ.
    J Pediatr Surg; 2007 Jun 24; 42(6):939-42; discussion 942. PubMed ID: 17560198
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Laparoscopic Versus Open Adhesiolysis for Small Bowel Obstruction: A Single-Center Retrospective Case-Control Study.
    Lin H, Li J, Xie Z, Zhang W, Lv X.
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2016 Jun 24; 26(3):244-7. PubMed ID: 27077222
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Laparoscopic versus open approach for adhesive small bowel obstruction, a systematic review and meta-analysis of short term outcomes.
    Krielen P, Di Saverio S, Ten Broek R, Renzi C, Zago M, Popivanov G, Ruscelli P, Marzaioli R, Chiarugi M, Cirocchi R.
    J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2020 Jun 24; 88(6):866-874. PubMed ID: 32195994
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A systematic review comparing laparoscopic vs open adhesiolysis in patients with adhesional small bowel obstruction.
    Sajid MS, Khawaja AH, Sains P, Singh KK, Baig MK.
    Am J Surg; 2016 Jul 24; 212(1):138-50. PubMed ID: 27162071
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery for Acute Adhesive Small-Bowel Obstruction: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.
    Hackenberg T, Mentula P, Leppäniemi A, Sallinen V.
    Scand J Surg; 2017 Mar 24; 106(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 27048680
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Laparoscopic versus open surgery in small bowel obstruction.
    Cirocchi R, Abraha I, Farinella E, Montedori A, Sciannameo F.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2010 Feb 17; 2010(2):CD007511. PubMed ID: 20166096
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Laparoscopic lysis of adhesions.
    Szomstein S, Lo Menzo E, Simpfendorfer C, Zundel N, Rosenthal RJ.
    World J Surg; 2006 Apr 17; 30(4):535-40. PubMed ID: 16555020
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Impact of hospital volume on outcomes for laparoscopic adhesiolysis for small bowel obstruction.
    Jean RA, O'Neill KM, Pei KY, Davis KA.
    J Surg Res; 2017 Jun 15; 214():23-31. PubMed ID: 28624050
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Laparoscopic versus open adhesiolysis in patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Li MZ, Lian L, Xiao LB, Wu WH, He YL, Song XM.
    Am J Surg; 2012 Nov 15; 204(5):779-86. PubMed ID: 22794708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Clinical outcomes of laparoscopic adhesiolysis for mechanical small bowel obstruction.
    Okamoto H, Wakana H, Kawashima K, Fukasawa T, Fujii H.
    Asian J Endosc Surg; 2012 May 15; 5(2):53-8. PubMed ID: 22776364
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Early laparoscopic adhesiolysis for small bowel obstruction: retrospective study of main advantages.
    Mazzetti CH, Serinaldi F, Lebrun E, Lemaitre J.
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Jun 15; 32(6):2781-2792. PubMed ID: 29218668
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Laparoscopic versus open adhesiolysis for adhesive small bowel obstruction (LASSO): an international, multicentre, randomised, open-label trial.
    Sallinen V, Di Saverio S, Haukijärvi E, Juusela R, Wikström H, Koivukangas V, Catena F, Enholm B, Birindelli A, Leppäniemi A, Mentula P.
    Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Apr 15; 4(4):278-286. PubMed ID: 30765264
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Does laparoscopic adhesiolysis decrease the risk of recurrent symptoms in small bowel obstruction? A propensity score-matched analysis.
    Yao S, Tanaka E, Matsui Y, Ikeda A, Murakami T, Okumoto T, Harada T.
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Dec 15; 31(12):5348-5355. PubMed ID: 28593412
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Laparoscopic appendicectomy is superior to open surgery for complicated appendicitis.
    Quah GS, Eslick GD, Cox MR.
    Surg Endosc; 2019 Jul 15; 33(7):2072-2082. PubMed ID: 30868324
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.