These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

407 related items for PubMed ID: 30471259

  • 1. Responsiveness and minimally important difference of SF-6D and EQ-5D utility scores for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
    Harvie HS, Honeycutt AA, Neuwahl SJ, Barber MD, Richter HE, Visco AG, Sung VW, Shepherd JP, Rogers RG, Jakus-Waldman S, Mazloomdoost D, NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 220(3):265.e1-265.e11. PubMed ID: 30471259
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Validity of utility measures for women with pelvic organ prolapse.
    Harvie HS, Lee DD, Andy UU, Shea JA, Arya LA.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 218(1):119.e1-119.e8. PubMed ID: 28988907
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Validity and responsiveness of EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D in patients with health complaints attributed to their amalgam fillings: a prospective cohort study of patients undergoing amalgam removal.
    Lamu AN, Björkman L, Hamre HJ, Alræk T, Musial F, Robberstad B.
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2021 Apr 17; 19(1):125. PubMed ID: 33865400
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A comparison of utility measurement using EQ-5D and SF-6D preference-based generic instruments in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
    Salaffi F, Carotti M, Ciapetti A, Gasparini S, Grassi W.
    Clin Exp Rheumatol; 2011 Apr 17; 29(4):661-71. PubMed ID: 21813061
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A head-to-head comparison of EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D in Dutch patients with fractures visiting a Fracture Liaison Service.
    Li N, Boonen A, van den Bergh JP, van Kuijk SMJ, Wyers CE, van Oostwaard M, Vranken L, Bours SPG, Hiligsmann M.
    J Med Econ; 2022 Apr 17; 25(1):829-839. PubMed ID: 35674412
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Differential Psychometric Properties of EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level and Short-Form 6-Dimension Utility Measures in Low Back Pain.
    Cheung PWH, Wong CKH, Cheung JPY.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Jun 01; 44(11):E679-E686. PubMed ID: 30475342
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Validity of utility measures for women with urge, stress, and mixed urinary incontinence.
    Harvie HS, Shea JA, Andy UU, Propert K, Schwartz JS, Arya LA.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jan 01; 210(1):85.e1-6. PubMed ID: 24055585
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. An investigation into the empirical validity of the EQ-5D and SF-6D based on hypothetical preferences in a general population.
    Petrou S, Hockley C.
    Health Econ; 2005 Nov 01; 14(11):1169-89. PubMed ID: 15942981
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of the EQ-5D and the SF-6D utility measures in 813 patients with early arthritis: results from the ESPOIR cohort.
    Gaujoux-Viala C, Rat AC, Guillemin F, Flipo RM, Fardellone P, Bourgeois P, Fautrel B.
    J Rheumatol; 2011 Aug 01; 38(8):1576-84. PubMed ID: 21532054
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 21.