These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
307 related items for PubMed ID: 30479060
1. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of povidone-iodine foam dressing (Betafoam), hydrocellular foam dressing (Allevyn), and petrolatum gauze for split-thickness skin graft donor site dressing. Pak CS, Park DH, Oh TS, Lee WJ, Jun YJ, Lee KA, Oh KS, Kwak KH, Rhie JW. Int Wound J; 2019 Apr; 16(2):379-386. PubMed ID: 30479060 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Efficacy of a povidone-iodine foam dressing (Betafoam) on diabetic foot ulcer. Gwak HC, Han SH, Lee J, Park S, Sung KS, Kim HJ, Chun D, Lee K, Ahn JH, Kwak K, Chung HJ. Int Wound J; 2020 Feb; 17(1):91-99. PubMed ID: 31773882 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Topical petrolatum gel alone versus topical silver sulfadiazine with standard gauze dressings for the treatment of superficial partial thickness burns in adults: a randomized controlled trial. Genuino GA, Baluyut-Angeles KV, Espiritu AP, Lapitan MC, Buckley BS. Burns; 2014 Nov; 40(7):1267-73. PubMed ID: 25172229 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of skin graft donor site management using oxidised regenerated cellulose (ORC)/collagen/silver-ORC with absorptive silicone adhesive border and transparent film dressing vs semi-occlusive dressings. Chowdhry SA. Int Wound J; 2023 Apr; 20(4):1112-1117. PubMed ID: 36151766 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Randomised clinical trial of Hydrofiber dressing with silver versus povidone-iodine gauze in the management of open surgical and traumatic wounds. Jurczak F, Dugré T, Johnstone A, Offori T, Vujovic Z, Hollander D, AQUACEL Ag Surgical/Trauma Wound Study Group. Int Wound J; 2007 Mar; 4(1):66-76. PubMed ID: 17425549 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of Dressing Materials on Donor Site Morbidity: A Comparative Study at a Tertiary Hospital in Kenya. Macharia M, Nangole FW. Ann Plast Surg; 2019 Jul; 83(1):22-25. PubMed ID: 31194707 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison between DACC with chlorhexidine acetate-soaked paraffin gauze and foam dressing for skin graft donor sites. Lee JW, Park SH, Suh IS, Jeong HS. J Wound Care; 2018 Jan 02; 27(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 29333932 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Dressing the split-thickness skin graft donor site: a randomized clinical trial. Karlsson M, Lindgren M, Jarnhed-Andersson I, Tarpila E. Adv Skin Wound Care; 2014 Jan 02; 27(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 24343389 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The silver-releasing foam dressing, Contreet Foam, promotes faster healing of critically colonised venous leg ulcers: a randomised, controlled trial. Jørgensen B, Price P, Andersen KE, Gottrup F, Bech-Thomsen N, Scanlon E, Kirsner R, Rheinen H, Roed-Petersen J, Romanelli M, Jemec G, Leaper DJ, Neumann MH, Veraart J, Coerper S, Agerslev RH, Bendz SH, Larsen JR, Sibbald RG. Int Wound J; 2005 Mar 02; 2(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 16722854 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of an oxygen-diffusion dressing for accelerated healing of donor-site wounds. Lairet KF, Baer D, Leas ML, Renz EM, Cancio LC. J Burn Care Res; 2014 Mar 02; 35(3):214-8. PubMed ID: 23877142 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Split-skin graft in the management of diabetic foot ulcers. Mahmoud SM, Mohamed AA, Mahdi SE, Ahmed ME. J Wound Care; 2008 Jul 02; 17(7):303-6. PubMed ID: 18705232 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of a polyurethane foam dressing impregnated with 3% povidone-iodine (Betafoam) in a rat wound model. Lee JW, Song KY. Ann Surg Treat Res; 2018 Jan 02; 94(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 29333419 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Highly Hydrophilic Polyurethane Foam Dressing Versus Early Hydrophilic Polyurethane Foam Dressing on Skin Graft Donor Site Healing in Patients with Diabetes: An Exploratory Clinical Trial. Namgoong S, Jung JE, Yoon YD, Han SK, Lee YN, Son JW. Adv Skin Wound Care; 2020 Jun 02; 33(6):319-323. PubMed ID: 32427788 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A prospective comparison of a new, synthetic donor site dressing versus an impregnated gauze dressing. Hickerson WL, Kealey GP, Smith DJ, Thomson PD. J Burn Care Rehabil; 1994 Jun 02; 15(4):359-63. PubMed ID: 7929519 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A hydrocellular foam dressing versus gauze: effects on the healing of rat excisional wounds. Kunugiza Y, Tomita T, Moritomo H, Yoshikawa H. J Wound Care; 2010 Jan 02; 19(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 20081568 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]