These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

450 related items for PubMed ID: 30479267

  • 1. The Relationship between Random Gap Detection and Hearing in Noise Test Performances.
    Heeke P, Vermiglio AJ, Bulla E, Velappan K, Fang X.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018; 29(10):948-954. PubMed ID: 30479267
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Sentence Recognition in Steady-State Speech-Shaped Noise versus Four-Talker Babble.
    Vermiglio AJ, Herring CC, Heeke P, Post CE, Fang X.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Jan; 30(1):54-65. PubMed ID: 30461388
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The relationship between high-frequency pure-tone hearing loss, hearing in noise test (HINT) thresholds, and the articulation index.
    Vermiglio AJ, Soli SD, Freed DJ, Fisher LM.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Jan; 23(10):779-88. PubMed ID: 23169195
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Understanding excessive SNR loss in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Grant KW, Walden TC.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):258-73; quiz 337-8. PubMed ID: 23636208
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Temporal processing in low-frequency channels: effects of age and hearing loss in middle-aged listeners.
    Leigh-Paffenroth ED, Elangovan S.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Apr; 22(7):393-404. PubMed ID: 21993047
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Clinical experience with the words-in-noise test on 3430 veterans: comparisons with pure-tone thresholds and word recognition in quiet.
    Wilson RH.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Apr; 22(7):405-23. PubMed ID: 21993048
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR, Ahlstrom JB, Dubno JR.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A comparison of two word-recognition tasks in multitalker babble: Speech Recognition in Noise Test (SPRINT) and Words-in-Noise Test (WIN).
    Wilson RH, Cates WB.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Sep; 19(7):548-56. PubMed ID: 19248731
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A convergent validity study: Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences (LiSN-S) test and the Hearing in Noise Test (HINT).
    Vermiglio AJ, Bulla E, Skinner J, Heeke P, Fang X, Velappan K, Bonilla E, Garner E.
    Int J Audiol; 2021 Jan; 60(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 32689850
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Performance of normal young adults in two temporal resolution tests].
    Zaidan E, Garcia AP, Tedesco ML, Baran JA.
    Pro Fono; 2008 Jan; 20(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 18408859
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. An Evaluation of the World Health Organization and American Medical Association Ratings of Hearing Impairment and Simulated Single-Sided Deafness.
    Vermiglio AJ, Griffin S, Post C, Fang X.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Jan; 29(7):634-647. PubMed ID: 29988011
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The Relationship between Speech Perception in Quiet and in Noise for Young Adults with Pure-Tone Thresholds ≤ 25 dB HL.
    Vermiglio AJ, Osborne HR, Bonilla E, Leclerc L, Thornton M, Fang X.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 Jul; 33(7-08):390-395. PubMed ID: 39074795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The Effect of Stimulus Audibility on the Relationship between Pure-Tone Average and Speech Recognition in Noise Ability.
    Vermiglio AJ, Soli SD, Freed DJ, Fang X.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Mar; 31(3):224-232. PubMed ID: 31274071
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Reception thresholds for sentences in quiet and noise for monolingual English and bilingual Mandarin-English listeners.
    Stuart A, Zhang J, Swink S.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Apr; 21(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 20388450
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. An Argument for Self-Report as a Reference Standard in Audiology.
    Vermiglio AJ, Soli SD, Fang X.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Mar; 29(3):206-222. PubMed ID: 29488871
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Speech-in-speech listening on the LiSN-S test by older adults with good audiograms depends on cognition and hearing acuity at high frequencies.
    Besser J, Festen JM, Goverts ST, Kramer SE, Pichora-Fuller MK.
    Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):24-41. PubMed ID: 25207850
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The MAndarin spoken word-Picture IDentification test in noise-Adaptive (MAPID-A) measures subtle speech-recognition-in-noise changes and spatial release from masking in very young children.
    Yuen KCP, Qiu XY, Mou HY, Xi X.
    PLoS One; 2019 Jan; 14(1):e0209768. PubMed ID: 30629627
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Speech Recognition and Spatial Hearing in Young Adults With Down Syndrome: Relationships With Hearing Thresholds and Auditory Working Memory.
    Anshu K, Kristensen K, Godar SP, Zhou X, Hartley SL, Litovsky RY.
    Ear Hear; 2019 Jan; 45(6):1568-1584. PubMed ID: 39090791
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Random Gap Detection Test and Random Gap Detection Test-Expanded results in children with auditory neuropathy.
    Yalçinkaya F, Muluk NB, Ataş A, Keith RW.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Nov; 73(11):1558-63. PubMed ID: 19735949
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR, Horwitz AR, Ahlstrom JB.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 23.