These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

157 related items for PubMed ID: 30487096

  • 1. Are psychophysically chosen lifting loads based on joint kinetics?
    Banks JJ, Caldwell GE.
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Jan; 74():17-23. PubMed ID: 30487096
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Postural effects on biomechanical and psychophysical weight-lifting limits.
    Chaffin DB, Page GB.
    Ergonomics; 1994 Apr; 37(4):663-76. PubMed ID: 8187750
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Maximum acceptable weight of lift reflects peak lumbosacral extension moments in a functional capacity evaluation test using free style, stoop and squat lifting.
    Kuijer PP, van Oostrom SH, Duijzer K, van Dieën JH.
    Ergonomics; 2012 Apr; 55(3):343-9. PubMed ID: 22409171
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A field evaluation method for assessing whole body biomechanical joint stress in manual lifting tasks.
    Lin CJ, Wang SJ, Chen HJ.
    Ind Health; 2006 Oct; 44(4):604-12. PubMed ID: 17085922
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Maximum acceptable weights for asymmetric lifting of Chinese females.
    Wu SP.
    Appl Ergon; 2003 May; 34(3):215-24. PubMed ID: 12737921
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Using a marker-less method for estimating L5/S1 moments during symmetrical lifting.
    Mehrizi R, Xu X, Zhang S, Pavlovic V, Metaxas D, Li K.
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Nov; 65():541-550. PubMed ID: 28110917
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Psychophysically determining the maximum acceptable weight of lift for polypropylene laminated bags.
    Chen YL, Ho TK.
    Ind Health; 2016 Dec 07; 54(6):550-553. PubMed ID: 27181917
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Psychophysically determined asymmetrical lifting capabilities for different frequencies and containers.
    Lee TH.
    Ind Health; 2005 Apr 07; 43(2):337-40. PubMed ID: 15895850
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Sex-based differences in lifting technique under increasing load conditions: A principal component analysis.
    Sheppard PS, Stevenson JM, Graham RB.
    Appl Ergon; 2016 May 07; 54():186-95. PubMed ID: 26851478
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Estimation of 3-D peak L5/S1 joint moment during asymmetric lifting tasks with cubic spline interpolation of segment Euler angles.
    Xu X, Chang CC, Faber GS, Kingma I, Dennerlein JT.
    Appl Ergon; 2012 Jan 07; 43(1):115-20. PubMed ID: 21529774
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Feature extraction and quantification of the variability of dynamic performance profiles due to the different sagittal lift characteristics.
    Khalaf KA, Parnianpour M, Sparto PJ, Barin K.
    IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng; 1999 Sep 07; 7(3):278-88. PubMed ID: 10498374
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Two linear regression models predicting cumulative dynamic L5/S1 joint moment during a range of lifting tasks based on static postures.
    Xu X, Chang CC, Lu ML.
    Ergonomics; 2012 Sep 07; 55(9):1093-103. PubMed ID: 22803616
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Analysis of squat and stoop dynamic liftings: muscle forces and internal spinal loads.
    Bazrgari B, Shirazi-Adl A, Arjmand N.
    Eur Spine J; 2007 May 07; 16(5):687-99. PubMed ID: 17103232
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Maximum acceptable weight of lift for manual lifting tasks].
    Chen J, Yang L.
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2006 Apr 07; 24(4):194-7. PubMed ID: 16701027
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Biomechanical Assessment of the NIOSH Lifting Equation in Asymmetric Load-Handling Activities Using a Detailed Musculoskeletal Model.
    Behjati M, Arjmand N.
    Hum Factors; 2019 Mar 07; 61(2):191-202. PubMed ID: 30222936
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.