These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
155 related items for PubMed ID: 3049843
21. Effects of a new nonionic and a conventional ionic contrast agent on coronary sinus ionized calcium and left ventricular hemodynamics in dogs. Bourdillon PD, Bettmann MA, McCracken S, Poole-Wilson PA, Grossman W. J Am Coll Cardiol; 1985 Oct; 6(4):845-53. PubMed ID: 4031299 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Interaction between verapamil and contrast media in coronary arteriography: comparison of standard ionic and new nonionic media. Higgins CB, Kuber M, Slutsky RA. Circulation; 1983 Sep; 68(3):628-35. PubMed ID: 6872173 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Improvement of IVDSA of the brachiocephalic arteries using a non-ionic contrast medium. Thijssen HO, Merx JL, Thijssen MA, Keyser A, Schoonderwaldt H, Wong Chung R. Neuroradiology; 1988 Sep; 30(3):211-3. PubMed ID: 3043251 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of iohexol with meglumine-Na diatrizoate for intravenous digital subtraction angiography. Seeger JF, Carmody RF, Smith JR, Horsley WW, Criss E. Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983 Sep; 366():85-8. PubMed ID: 6382940 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of an ionic with a nonionic contrast agent for cardiac angiography. Results of a multicenter trial. Bettmann MA, Higgins CB. Invest Radiol; 1985 Sep; 20(1 Suppl):S70-4. PubMed ID: 3882619 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Direct and reflex myocardial effects of intracoronary administered contrast materials in the anesthetized and conscious dog: comparison of standard and newer contrast materials. Higgins CB, Schmidt W. Invest Radiol; 1978 Sep; 13(3):205-16. PubMed ID: 30733 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. [Comparison of the tolerance of ionic and nonionic contrast media in coronary angiography]. Savchenko AP, Frolova MI, Pavlov NA. Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1993 Sep; (6):21-4. PubMed ID: 7801591 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparative hemodynamic effects of coronary vasodilators and contrast material on the normal and ischemic canine myocardium: determination of the optimal agent for clinical augmentation of coronary blood flow. Higgins CB, Bookstein JJ. Invest Radiol; 1977 Sep; 12(4):299-306. PubMed ID: 407173 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Effects of contrast media on myocardial function during acute left ventricular failure in the dog. Kløw NE, Hevrøy O, Dale K, Mjøs OD. Invest Radiol; 1990 Jan; 25(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 2298549 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Myocardial contrast echocardiography: cardiovascular effects of the contrast medium SHU 454 in dogs. Heidelmeyer CF, Brueckner JB, Schartl M. J Cardiothorac Anesth; 1990 Feb; 4(1):60-7. PubMed ID: 2131858 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Changes in ventricular fibrillation threshold induced by contrast agents during acute coronary artery occlusion. Wolf GL, Mulry CS, Laski PA, Kilzer K. Invest Radiol; 1983 Feb; 18(2):145-8. PubMed ID: 6862805 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Digital angiographic impulse response analysis of regional myocardial perfusion: linearity, reproducibility, accuracy, and comparison with conventional indicator dilution curve parameters in phantom and canine models. Eigler NL, Pfaff JM, Zeiher A, Whiting JS, Forrester JS. Circ Res; 1989 May; 64(5):853-66. PubMed ID: 2650918 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]