These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

893 related items for PubMed ID: 30525333

  • 21. Beef consumer segment profiles based on information source usage in Poland.
    Żakowska-Biemans S, Pieniak Z, Gutkowska K, Wierzbicki J, Cieszyńska K, Sajdakowska M, Kosicka-Gębska M.
    Meat Sci; 2017 Feb; 124():105-113. PubMed ID: 27865127
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Beef meat preferences of consumers from Northwest Italy: Analysis of choice attributes.
    Merlino VM, Borra D, Girgenti V, Dal Vecchio A, Massaglia S.
    Meat Sci; 2018 Sep; 143():119-128. PubMed ID: 29738962
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Diversity of Japanese consumers' requirements, sensory perceptions, and eating preferences for meat.
    Sasaki K.
    Anim Sci J; 2022 Sep; 93(1):e13705. PubMed ID: 35266248
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Influence of quality labels on the formation of preferences of lamb meat consumers. A Spanish case study.
    Bernabéu R, Rabadán A, El Orche NE, Díaz M.
    Meat Sci; 2018 Jan; 135():129-133. PubMed ID: 28968556
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Regional, socioeconomic and behavioural- impacts on consumer acceptability of beef in Northern Ireland, Republic of Ireland and Great Britain.
    Chong FS, Farmer LJ, Hagan TDJ, Speers JS, Sanderson DW, Devlin DJ, Tollerton IJ, Gordon AW, Methven L, Moloney AP, Kerry JP, O'Sullivan MG.
    Meat Sci; 2019 Aug; 154():86-95. PubMed ID: 31022586
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Identification and characterization of fluid milk consumer groups.
    Harwood WS, Drake MA.
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Oct; 101(10):8860-8874. PubMed ID: 30100510
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Prediction of the conditions for the consumption of game by Polish consumers.
    Kwiecińska K, Kosicka-Gębska M, Gębski J, Gutkowska K.
    Meat Sci; 2017 Sep; 131():28-33. PubMed ID: 28456091
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Effect of organic poultry purchase frequency on consumer attitudes toward organic poultry meat.
    Van Loo E, Caputo V, Nayga RM, Meullenet JF, Crandall PG, Ricke SC.
    J Food Sci; 2010 Sep; 75(7):S384-97. PubMed ID: 21535573
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Organic Food Purchases in an Emerging Market: The Influence of Consumers' Personal Factors and Green Marketing Practices of Food Stores.
    Nguyen HV, Nguyen N, Nguyen BK, Lobo A, Vu PA.
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Mar 22; 16(6):. PubMed ID: 30909390
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Consumer Attitudes Towards Environmental Concerns of Meat Consumption: A Systematic Review.
    Sanchez-Sabate R, Sabaté J.
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Apr 05; 16(7):. PubMed ID: 30959755
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 45.