These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

313 related items for PubMed ID: 30539701

  • 1. Cryoballoon Ablation for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-analysis.
    Patel N, Patel K, Shenoy A, Baker WL, Makaryus AN, El-Sherif N.
    Curr Cardiol Rev; 2019; 15(3):230-238. PubMed ID: 30539701
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Outcomes of cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation in symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation.
    Hoffmann E, Straube F, Wegscheider K, Kuniss M, Andresen D, Wu LQ, Tebbenjohanns J, Noelker G, Tilz RR, Chun JKR, Franke A, Stellbrink C, Garcia-Alberola A, Dorwarth U, Metzner A, Ouarrak T, Brachmann J, Kuck KH, Senges J, FREEZE Cohort Study Investigators .
    Europace; 2019 Sep 01; 21(9):1313-1324. PubMed ID: 31199860
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing second-generation cryoballoon and contact force radiofrequency ablation for initial ablation of paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation.
    Ravi V, Poudyal A, Pulipati P, Larsen T, Krishnan K, Trohman RG, Sharma PS, Huang HD.
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2020 Oct 01; 31(10):2559-2571. PubMed ID: 32671920
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Cryoballoon versus radiofrequency catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
    Wasserlauf J, Pelchovitz DJ, Rhyner J, Verma N, Bohn M, Li Z, Arora R, Chicos AB, Goldberger JJ, Kim SS, Lin AC, Knight BP, Passman RS.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2015 Apr 01; 38(4):483-9. PubMed ID: 25627795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Pulsed-field vs. cryoballoon vs. radiofrequency ablation: a propensity score matched comparison of one-year outcomes after pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
    Maurhofer J, Kueffer T, Madaffari A, Stettler R, Stefanova A, Seiler J, Thalmann G, Kozhuharov N, Galuszka O, Servatius H, Haeberlin A, Noti F, Tanner H, Roten L, Reichlin T.
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2024 Mar 01; 67(2):389-397. PubMed ID: 37776355
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Cryoballoon versus radiofrequency ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta‑analysis.
    Liu XH, Gao XF, Jin CL, Chen CF, Chen B, Xu YZ.
    Kardiol Pol; 2020 Jan 24; 78(1):20-29. PubMed ID: 31688837
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Cryoballoon vs radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation: insights from the Veterans Healthcare System.
    Maskoun W, Abualsuod A, Habash F, Madmani ME, Khaled K, Gheith Z, Alqam B, Miller JM, Vallurupalli S.
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2021 Dec 24; 62(3):531-538. PubMed ID: 33415707
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation using a second-generation cryoballoon catheter or contact-force sensing radiofrequency ablation catheter: A comparison of costs and long-term clinical outcomes.
    Yokokawa M, Chugh A, Latchamsetty R, Ghanbari H, Crawford T, Jongnarangsin K, Cunnane R, Saeed M, Hornsby K, Krishnasamy K, Lohawijarn W, Keast R, Karpenko D, Bogun F, Pelosi F, Morady F, Oral H.
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2018 Feb 24; 29(2):284-290. PubMed ID: 29071765
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Cryoballoon vs. radiofrequency catheter ablation: insights from NOrwegian randomized study of PERSistent Atrial Fibrillation (NO-PERSAF study).
    Shi LB, Rossvoll O, Tande P, Schuster P, Solheim E, Chen J.
    Europace; 2022 Feb 02; 24(2):226-233. PubMed ID: 35134151
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Myocardial injury biomarkers after radiofrequency catheter and cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation and their impact on recurrence.
    Kızılırmak F, Gokdeniz T, Gunes HM, Demir GG, Cakal B, Guler GB, Guler E, Olgun FE, Kilicaslan F.
    Kardiol Pol; 2017 Feb 02; 75(2):126-134. PubMed ID: 27221959
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Cryoballoon antral pulmonary vein isolation vs contact force-sensing radiofrequency catheter ablation for pulmonary vein and posterior left atrial isolation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.
    Yokokawa M, Chugh A, Latchamsetty R, Ghanbari H, Crawford T, Jongnarangsin K, Cunnane R, Saeed M, Sunkara B, Tezcan M, Bogun F, Pelosi F, Morady F, Oral H.
    Heart Rhythm; 2018 Dec 02; 15(12):1835-1841. PubMed ID: 30509365
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Procedure characteristics and outcomes of atrial fibrillation ablation procedures using cryoballoon versus radiofrequency ablation: A report from the GWTG-AFIB registry.
    Friedman DJ, Holmes D, Curtis AB, Ellenbogen KA, Frankel DS, Knight BP, Russo AM, Matsouaka R, Turakhia MP, Lewis WR, Piccini JP.
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2021 Feb 02; 32(2):248-259. PubMed ID: 33368764
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.