These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
266 related items for PubMed ID: 30545680
21. Histogram analysis in prostate cancer: a comparison of diffusion kurtosis imaging model versus monoexponential model. Jiang Y, Li C, Liu Y, Shi K, Zhang W, Liu M, Chen M. Acta Radiol; 2020 Oct; 61(10):1431-1440. PubMed ID: 32008343 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Whole-tumor texture model based on diffusion kurtosis imaging for assessing cervical cancer: a preliminary study. Zhang Q, Yu X, Ouyang H, Zhang J, Chen S, Xie L, Zhao X. Eur Radiol; 2021 Aug; 31(8):5576-5585. PubMed ID: 33464399 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparative Analysis of Diffusional Kurtosis Imaging, Diffusion Tensor Imaging, and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Grading and Assessing Cellular Proliferation of Meningiomas. Lin L, Bhawana R, Xue Y, Duan Q, Jiang R, Chen H, Chen X, Sun B, Lin H. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2018 Jun; 39(6):1032-1038. PubMed ID: 29748203 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Advanced Diffusion-weighted Imaging Modeling for Prostate Cancer Characterization: Correlation with Quantitative Histopathologic Tumor Tissue Composition-A Hypothesis-generating Study. Hectors SJ, Semaan S, Song C, Lewis S, Haines GK, Tewari A, Rastinehad AR, Taouli B. Radiology; 2018 Mar; 286(3):918-928. PubMed ID: 29117481 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Diagnostic evaluation of magnetization transfer and diffusion kurtosis imaging for prostate cancer detection in a re-biopsy population. Barrett T, McLean M, Priest AN, Lawrence EM, Patterson AJ, Koo BC, Patterson I, Warren AY, Doble A, Gnanapragasam VJ, Kastner C, Gallagher FA. Eur Radiol; 2018 Aug; 28(8):3141-3150. PubMed ID: 29222677 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Non-small cell lung cancer: Whole-lesion histogram analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient for assessment of tumor grade, lymphovascular invasion and pleural invasion. Tsuchiya N, Doai M, Usuda K, Uramoto H, Tonami H. PLoS One; 2017 Aug; 12(2):e0172433. PubMed ID: 28207858 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Histogram analysis of diffusion kurtosis imaging in the differentiation of malignant from benign breast lesions. Liu W, Wei C, Bai J, Gao X, Zhou L. Eur J Radiol; 2019 Aug; 117():156-163. PubMed ID: 31307642 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Differences in Gaussian diffusion tensor imaging and non-Gaussian diffusion kurtosis imaging model-based estimates of diffusion tensor invariants in the human brain. Lanzafame S, Giannelli M, Garaci F, Floris R, Duggento A, Guerrisi M, Toschi N. Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2464. PubMed ID: 27147357 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Gliomas: diffusion kurtosis MR imaging in grading. Van Cauter S, Veraart J, Sijbers J, Peeters RR, Himmelreich U, De Keyzer F, Van Gool SW, Van Calenbergh F, De Vleeschouwer S, Van Hecke W, Sunaert S. Radiology; 2012 May; 263(2):492-501. PubMed ID: 22403168 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Prostate Cancer: Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging for Detection and Assessment of Aggressiveness-Comparison between Conventional and Kurtosis Models. Tamada T, Prabhu V, Li J, Babb JS, Taneja SS, Rosenkrantz AB. Radiology; 2017 Jul; 284(1):100-108. PubMed ID: 28394755 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Grading meningiomas with diffusion metrics: a comparison between diffusion kurtosis, mean apparent propagator, neurite orientation dispersion and density, and diffusion tensor imaging. She D, Huang H, Guo W, Jiang D, Zhao X, Kang Y, Cao D. Eur Radiol; 2023 May; 33(5):3671-3681. PubMed ID: 36897347 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Stretched-exponential and mono-exponential diffusion-weighted imaging for assessing the aggressiveness of prostate cancer: A histogram analysis]. Yu YN, Zhang SJ. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2019 Dec; 25(12):1106-1112. PubMed ID: 32251563 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Prostate cancer aggressiveness: assessment with whole-lesion histogram analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient. Donati OF, Mazaheri Y, Afaq A, Vargas HA, Zheng J, Moskowitz CS, Hricak H, Akin O. Radiology; 2014 Apr; 271(1):143-52. PubMed ID: 24475824 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Histogram analysis of stretched-exponential and monoexponential diffusion-weighted imaging models for distinguishing low and intermediate/high gleason scores in prostate carcinoma. Liu W, Liu XH, Tang W, Gao HB, Zhou BN, Zhou LP. J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Aug; 48(2):491-498. PubMed ID: 29412492 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Quantitative evaluation of diffusion-kurtosis imaging for grading endometrial carcinoma: a comparative study with diffusion-weighted imaging. Chen T, Li Y, Lu SS, Zhang YD, Wang XN, Luo CY, Shi HB. Clin Radiol; 2017 Nov; 72(11):995.e11-995.e20. PubMed ID: 28774471 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Characterization of prostate cancer using diffusion tensor imaging: A new perspective. Gholizadeh N, Greer PB, Simpson J, Denham J, Lau P, Dowling J, Hondermarck H, Ramadan S. Eur J Radiol; 2019 Jan; 110():112-120. PubMed ID: 30599846 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Value of diffusion kurtosis imaging in assessing low-grade gliomas. Goryawala MZ, Heros DO, Komotar RJ, Sheriff S, Saraf-Lavi E, Maudsley AA. J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Dec; 48(6):1551-1558. PubMed ID: 29573042 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Diffusion kurtosis imaging as a neuroimaging biomarker in patients with carbon monoxide intoxication. Lee JJ, Chang WN, Hsu JL, Huang CW, Chang YT, Hsu SW, Huang SH, Lee CC, Lien CY, Chang CC. Neurotoxicology; 2018 Sep; 68():38-46. PubMed ID: 30017424 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Discriminating subcortical ischemic vascular disease and Alzheimer's disease by diffusion kurtosis imaging in segregated thalamic regions. Tu MC, Huang SM, Hsu YH, Yang JJ, Lin CY, Kuo LW. Hum Brain Mapp; 2021 May; 42(7):2018-2031. PubMed ID: 33416206 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Diffusion kurtosis imaging to assess correlations with clinicopathologic factors for bladder cancer: a comparison between the multi-b value method and the tensor method. Wang F, Chen HG, Zhang RY, Jin D, Xu SS, Wu GY, Xu JR. Eur Radiol; 2019 Aug; 29(8):4447-4455. PubMed ID: 30666451 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]