These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Differences in range of motion with the same combined anteversion after total hip arthroplasty. Ohmori T, Kabata T, Kajino Y, Taga T, Hasegawa K, Inoue D, Yamamoto T, Takagi T, Yoshitani J, Ueno T, Tsuchiya H. Int Orthop; 2018 May; 42(5):1021-1028. PubMed ID: 28990125 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimal combined anteversion range for obtaining a wider range of motion without prosthetic impingement after total hip arthroplasty: a three-dimensional analysis study. Hidaka R, Matsuda K, Nakamura M, Nakamura S, Kawano H. J Orthop Surg Res; 2022 Apr 10; 17(1):226. PubMed ID: 35399103 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The Impingement-free, Prosthesis-specific, and Anatomy-adjusted Combined Target Zone for Component Positioning in THA Depends on Design and Implantation Parameters of both Components. Widmer KH. Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Aug 10; 478(8):1904-1918. PubMed ID: 32732575 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Current standard rules of combined anteversion prevent prosthetic impingement but ignore osseous contact in total hip arthroplasty. Weber M, Woerner M, Craiovan B, Voellner F, Worlicek M, Springorum HR, Grifka J, Renkawitz T. Int Orthop; 2016 Dec 10; 40(12):2495-2504. PubMed ID: 27106215 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of optimal implant alignment in total hip arthroplasty based on postoperative range of motion simulation. Harada S, Hamai S, Motomura G, Ikemura S, Fujii M, Kawahara S, Sato T, Hara D, Nakashima Y. Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2022 Feb 10; 92():105555. PubMed ID: 35026659 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The Effect of Pelvic Tilt and Femoral Head Size on Hip Range-of-Motion to Impingement. McCarthy TF, Nevelos J, Elmallah RK, Chughtai M, Khlopas A, Alipit V, Wagner TC, Mont MA. J Arthroplasty; 2017 Nov 10; 32(11):3544-3549. PubMed ID: 28712801 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Theoretically optimum position of the prosthesis in total hip arthroplasty to fulfill the severe range of motion criteria due to neck impingement. Hisatome T, Doi H. J Orthop Sci; 2011 Mar 10; 16(2):229-37. PubMed ID: 21359509 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Cup safe zone and optimal stem anteversion in total hip arthroplasty for patients with highly required range of motion. Habe Y, Hamada H, Uemura K, Takashima K, Ando W, Sugano N. J Orthop Res; 2024 Jun 10; 42(6):1283-1291. PubMed ID: 38084832 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of combined anteversion in image-free navigated total hip arthroplasty: stem-first or cup-first technique? Fukunishi S, Nishio S, Fujihara Y, Okahisa S, Takeda Y, Fukui T, Yoshiya S. Int Orthop; 2016 Jan 10; 40(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 25947898 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion. Widmer KH, Zurfluh B. J Orthop Res; 2004 Jul 10; 22(4):815-21. PubMed ID: 15183439 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Anterior dislocation of a total hip replacement. Radiographic and CT-scan assessment. Behavior following conservative management. Di Schino M, Baudart F, Zilber S, Poignard A, Allain J. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Dec 10; 95(8):573-8. PubMed ID: 19945930 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]