These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

162 related items for PubMed ID: 3056359

  • 1. [Clinical trial of BOBCAT: 1st report on the reliability and validity of computerized pure-tone audiometry].
    Picard M, Ilecki HJ, Baxter JD.
    Audiology; 1988; 27(4):234-46. PubMed ID: 3056359
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Identification of conductive hearing loss using air conduction tests alone: reliability and validity of an automatic test battery.
    Convery E, Keidser G, Seeto M, Freeston K, Zhou D, Dillon H.
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):e1-8. PubMed ID: 24080948
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Clinical use of BOBCAT: testing reliability and validity of computerized pure-tone audiometry with noise-exposed workers, children and the aged.
    Picard M, Ilecki HJ, Baxter JD.
    Audiology; 1993; 32(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 8447762
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Validity of diagnostic computer-based air and forehead bone conduction audiometry.
    Swanepoel de W, Biagio L.
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2011 Apr; 8(4):210-4. PubMed ID: 21391065
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Measurements of click-evoked otoacoustic emission in industrial workers with noise-induced hearing loss.
    Kowalska S, Sułkowski W.
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 1997 Apr; 10(4):441-59. PubMed ID: 9575669
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The comparison of different calculation formulas for the interpretation of the pure-tone audiometry in the evaluation of professional hearing-loss.
    Lahaye D, Pattyn J.
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1980 Apr; 34(3):325-34. PubMed ID: 7234373
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a group of professional singers who have normal pure-tone hearing thresholds.
    Hamdan AL, Abouchacra KS, Zeki Al Hazzouri AG, Zaytoun G.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):360-77. PubMed ID: 18382377
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Findings of standard and high-frequency audiometry in workers exposed to occupational noise for long durations].
    Türkkahraman S, Gök U, Karlidağ T, Keleş E, Oztürk A.
    Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg; 2003 Apr; 10(4):137-42. PubMed ID: 12941983
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Distribution of hearing loss characteristics in a clinical population.
    Margolis RH, Saly GL.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):524-32. PubMed ID: 18600134
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The use of cortical evoked response audiometry in the assessment of noise-induced hearing loss.
    Hone SW, Norman G, Keogh I, Kelly V.
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2003 Feb; 128(2):257-62. PubMed ID: 12601323
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Active noise reduction audiometry: a prospective analysis of a new approach to noise management in audiometric testing.
    Bromwich MA, Parsa V, Lanthier N, Yoo J, Parnes LS.
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Jan; 118(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 18043495
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Reliability and accuracy of a method of adjustment for self-measurement of auditory thresholds.
    Van Tasell DJ, Folkeard P.
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Jan; 34(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 23202154
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The pure-tone hearing thresholds of otologically healthy 14-year-old children.
    Rahko-Laitila P, Karma P, Laippala P, Salmelin R, Sipilä M, Manninen M, Rahko T.
    Audiology; 2001 Jan; 40(4):171-7. PubMed ID: 11521708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Audiological findings among workers from Brazilian small-scale fisheries.
    Paini MC, Morata TC, Corteletti LJ, Albizu E, Marques JM, Santos L.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Feb; 30(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 19050644
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Audiometric evaluation in extended high frequencies of individuals exposed to occupational noise].
    Porto MA, Gahyva DL, Lauris JR, Lopes AC.
    Pro Fono; 2004 Feb; 16(3):237-50. PubMed ID: 15609579
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Usefulness of impedance audiometry in the objective evaluation of occupational hearing loss].
    Szmeja Z, Pruszewicz A, Obrebowski A, Szyfter W.
    Med Pr; 1983 Feb; 34(4):355-8. PubMed ID: 6664299
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Behavioral audiometry: protocols for measuring hearing thresholds in babies aged 4-18 months.
    Delaroche M, Thiebaut R, Dauman R.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2004 Oct; 68(10):1233-43. PubMed ID: 15364493
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Hearing assessment-reliability, accuracy, and efficiency of automated audiometry.
    Swanepoel de W, Mngemane S, Molemong S, Mkwanazi H, Tutshini S.
    Telemed J E Health; 2010 Jun; 16(5):557-63. PubMed ID: 20575723
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Computer-assisted audiometry versus manual audiometry.
    Ho AT, Hildreth AJ, Lindsey L.
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct; 30(7):876-83. PubMed ID: 20179426
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of hearing thresholds obtained using pure-tone behavioral audiometry, the Cantonese Hearing in Noise Test (CHINT) and cortical evoked response audiometry.
    Wong LL, Cheung C, Wong EC.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Jun; 128(6):654-60. PubMed ID: 18568500
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.