These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
212 related items for PubMed ID: 30570612
21. Clinical Outcomes of the Cochlear™ Nucleus(®) 5 Cochlear Implant System and SmartSound™ 2 Signal Processing. Runge CL, Henion K, Tarima S, Beiter A, Zwolan TA. J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Jun; 27(6):425-440. PubMed ID: 27310402 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Benefits of a contralateral routing of signal device for unilateral Naída CI cochlear implant recipients. Mosnier I, Lahlou G, Flament J, Mathias N, Ferrary E, Sterkers O, Bernardeschi D, Nguyen Y. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Aug; 276(8):2205-2213. PubMed ID: 31102018 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Benefits of Bilateral Hearing on the Telephone for Cochlear Implant Recipients. Miller S, Wolfe J, Duke M, Schafer E, Agrawal S, Koch D, Neumann S. J Am Acad Audiol; 2021 Mar; 32(3):180-185. PubMed ID: 33873219 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Speech Perception in Noise and Sound Localization for Cochlear Implant With Single-Sided Deafness Compared With Contralateral Routing of Signal Hearing Aids. Oyamada S, Takahashi M, Furutate S, Oka S, Kubota E, Sakurai A, Uekusa T, Watanabe K, Iwasaki S. Otol Neurotol; 2023 Apr 01; 44(4):331-338. PubMed ID: 36946362 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of Speech-in-Noise and Localization Benefits in Unilateral Hearing Loss Subjects Using Contralateral Routing of Signal Hearing Aids or Bone-Anchored Implants. Snapp HA, Holt FD, Liu X, Rajguru SM. Otol Neurotol; 2017 Jan 01; 38(1):11-18. PubMed ID: 27846038 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. A directional remote-microphone for bimodal cochlear implant recipients. Vroegop JL, Homans NC, Goedegebure A, van der Schroeff MP. Int J Audiol; 2018 Nov 01; 57(11):858-863. PubMed ID: 30261771 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Cochlear implantation and contralateral auditory brainstem implantation. Sinnathuray AR, Meller R, Cosso M, Magnan J. Otol Neurotol; 2012 Aug 01; 33(6):963-7. PubMed ID: 22772007 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Cochlear Implantation in Adults With Asymmetric Hearing Loss: Speech Recognition in Quiet and in Noise, and Health Related Quality of Life. Sladen DP, Carlson ML, Dowling BP, Olund AP, DeJong MD, Breneman A, Hollander S, Beatty CW, Neff BA, Driscoll CL. Otol Neurotol; 2018 Jun 01; 39(5):576-581. PubMed ID: 29683995 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Association of Self-Reported Coping Strategies With Speech Recognition Outcomes in Adult Cochlear Implant Users. Espahbodi M, Harvey E, Livingston AJ, Montagne W, Kozlowski K, Jensen J, Liu X, Juan W, Tarima S, Rusch M, Harris MS. Otol Neurotol; 2022 Sep 01; 43(8):e888-e894. PubMed ID: 35970167 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Can the use of the CROS system provide head shadow effect contribution to unilateral Cochlear Implant Users? Hoshino ACH, Goffi-Gomez MVS, Sierra PAS, Agrawal S, Rodriguez C, Carvalho ACM, Tsuji RK. Codas; 2022 Sep 01; 34(5):e20210071. PubMed ID: 35385028 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Speech Recognition in Noise in Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Recipients Using Digital Remote Wireless Microphone Technology. Wesarg T, Arndt S, Wiebe K, Schmid F, Huber A, Mülder HE, Laszig R, Aschendorff A, Speck I. J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Sep 01; 30(7):607-618. PubMed ID: 30430986 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Effectiveness in Rehabilitation of Current Wireless CROS Technology in Experienced Bone-Anchored Implant Users. Snapp HA, Hoffer ME, Liu X, Rajguru SM. Otol Neurotol; 2017 Dec 01; 38(10):1397-1404. PubMed ID: 29135863 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Using Microphone Technology to Improve Speech Perception in Noise in Children with Cochlear Implants. Johnstone PM, Mills KET, Humphrey E, Yeager KR, Jones E, McElligott K, Pierce A, Agrawal S, Froeling C, Little JP. J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Oct 01; 29(9):814-825. PubMed ID: 30278866 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Factors Predicting Postoperative Unilateral and Bilateral Speech Recognition in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients with Acoustic Hearing. Plant K, McDermott H, van Hoesel R, Dawson P, Cowan R. Ear Hear; 2016 Oct 01; 37(2):153-63. PubMed ID: 26462170 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Investigating Speech Recognition and listening effort with different device configurations in adult cochlear implant users. Sladen DP, Nie Y, Berg K. Cochlear Implants Int; 2018 May 01; 19(3):119-130. PubMed ID: 29457564 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Assessment of the contralateral routing of signal system in unilateral cochlear implantation. Guevara N, Grech C, Gahide I, Gallego S. Clin Otolaryngol; 2015 Dec 01; 40(6):535-44. PubMed ID: 25715980 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Older Individuals Meeting Medicare Cochlear Implant Candidacy Criteria in Noise but Not in Quiet: Are These Patients Improved by Surgery? Mudery JA, Francis R, McCrary H, Jacob A. Otol Neurotol; 2017 Feb 01; 38(2):187-191. PubMed ID: 27832005 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Effects of Training on the Use of a Manual Microphone Shutoff on a BiCROS Device. Kuk F, Seper E, Lau C, Crose B, Korhonen P. J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 May 01; 26(5):478-493. PubMed ID: 26055837 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Short-term outcomes of cochlear implantation for single-sided deafness compared to bone conduction devices and contralateral routing of sound hearing aids-Results of a Randomised controlled trial (CINGLE-trial). Peters JPM, van Heteren JAA, Wendrich AW, van Zanten GA, Grolman W, Stokroos RJ, Smit AL. PLoS One; 2021 May 01; 16(10):e0257447. PubMed ID: 34644322 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Recognition of Speech from the Television with Use of a Wireless Technology Designed for Cochlear Implants. Duke MM, Wolfe J, Schafer E. J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 May 01; 27(5):388-394. PubMed ID: 27179258 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]