These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
160 related items for PubMed ID: 30583671
1. Probably Benign Solid Breast Lesions on Ultrasound: Need for Biopsy Reassessed. Fatima K, Masroor I, Khanani S. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 Dec 25; 19(12):3467-3471. PubMed ID: 30583671 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk of malignancy in palpable solid breast masses considered probably benign or low suspicion: implications for management. Giess CS, Smeglin LZ, Meyer JE, Ritner JA, Birdwell RL. J Ultrasound Med; 2012 Dec 25; 31(12):1943-9. PubMed ID: 23197547 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Follow-up of palpable circumscribed noncalcified solid breast masses at mammography and US: can biopsy be averted? Graf O, Helbich TH, Fuchsjaeger MH, Hopf G, Morgun M, Graf C, Mallek R, Sickles EA. Radiology; 2004 Dec 25; 233(3):850-6. PubMed ID: 15486217 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Palpable breast masses with probably benign morphology at sonography: can biopsy be deferred? Park YM, Kim EK, Lee JH, Ryu JH, Han SS, Choi SJ, Lee SJ, Yoon HK. Acta Radiol; 2008 Dec 25; 49(10):1104-11. PubMed ID: 18855166 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Ultrasound follow-up of palpable solid, probably benign breast lesions (BI-RADS category III)]. Graf O, Helbich TH, Fuchsjäger MH, Hopf G, Morgun M, Graf C, Mallek R. Rofo; 2004 Sep 25; 176(9):1251-6. PubMed ID: 15346259 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. False-negative rate of combined mammography and ultrasound for women with palpable breast masses. Chan CH, Coopey SB, Freer PE, Hughes KS. Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Oct 25; 153(3):699-702. PubMed ID: 26341750 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. BI-RADS 3, 4, and 5 lesions: value of US in management--follow-up and outcome. Raza S, Chikarmane SA, Neilsen SS, Zorn LM, Birdwell RL. Radiology; 2008 Sep 25; 248(3):773-81. PubMed ID: 18647850 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Outcomes of solid palpable masses assessed as BI-RADS 3 or 4A: a retrospective review. Patterson SK, Neal CH, Jeffries DO, Joe A, Klein K, Bailey J, Pinsky R, Paramagul C, Watcharotone K. Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2014 Sep 25; 147(2):311-6. PubMed ID: 25151294 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Shear-wave elastography and greyscale assessment of palpable probably benign masses: is biopsy always required? Giannotti E, Vinnicombe S, Thomson K, McLean D, Purdie C, Jordan L, Evans A. Br J Radiol; 2016 Jun 25; 89(1062):20150865. PubMed ID: 27007593 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Histologic work-up of non-palpable breast lesions classified as probably benign at initial mammography and/or ultrasound (BI-RADS category 3). Gruber R, Jaromi S, Rudas M, Pfarl G, Riedl CC, Flöry D, Graf O, Sickles EA, Helbich TH. Eur J Radiol; 2013 Mar 25; 82(3):398-403. PubMed ID: 22429299 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical significance of interval changes in breast lesions initially categorized as probably benign on breast ultrasound. Jang JY, Kim SM, Kim JH, Jang M, La Yun B, Lee JY, Lee SH, Kim B. Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Mar 25; 96(12):e6415. PubMed ID: 28328843 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Targeted ultrasound of the breast in women with abnormal MRI findings for whom biopsy has been recommended. Meissnitzer M, Dershaw DD, Lee CH, Morris EA. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Oct 25; 193(4):1025-9. PubMed ID: 19770325 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Management of probably benign breast lesions. Sickles EA. Radiol Clin North Am; 1995 Nov 25; 33(6):1123-30. PubMed ID: 7480660 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classification in 51 excised palpable pediatric breast masses. Koning JL, Davenport KP, Poole PS, Kruk PG, Grabowski JE. J Pediatr Surg; 2015 Oct 25; 50(10):1746-50. PubMed ID: 25783351 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Pathologic assessment of non-palpable probably benign breast masses at sonography: can instant intervention be avoided and is follow-up adequate? Yücesoy C, Oktay NA, Oztürk E, Oktay M, Hücümenoğlu S, Alper M, Hekimoğlu B. JBR-BTR; 2010 Oct 25; 93(5):242-6. PubMed ID: 21179983 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast as a problem-solving method: to be or not to be? Oztekin PS, Kosar PN. Breast J; 2014 Oct 25; 20(6):622-31. PubMed ID: 25200378 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Short-term follow-up of palpable breast lesions with benign imaging features: evaluation of 375 lesions in 320 women. Harvey JA, Nicholson BT, Lorusso AP, Cohen MA, Bovbjerg VE. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Dec 25; 193(6):1723-30. PubMed ID: 19933671 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Reassessment and Follow-Up Results of BI-RADS Category 3 Lesions Detected on Screening Breast Ultrasound. Chae EY, Cha JH, Shin HJ, Choi WJ, Kim HH. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Mar 25; 206(3):666-72. PubMed ID: 26901026 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Neddle-guided biopsy in the diagnosis of non-palpable breast cancer]. Becerra-Alcántara GI, Círigo-Villagómez LL, Ramos-Medina F, Robledo-Martínez H, Mar-Merinos CG, Panzi-Altamirano RM. Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2015 Jul 25; 83(7):400-7. PubMed ID: 26422910 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Cancer yield of probably benign breast MR examinations. Eby PR, Demartini WB, Peacock S, Rosen EL, Lauro B, Lehman CD. J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Oct 25; 26(4):950-5. PubMed ID: 17896380 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]