These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

125 related items for PubMed ID: 30599867

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Two new models for the estimation of foetal weight more than a week before delivery: An MRI study.
    Liao K, Tang L, Peng C, Chen L, Chen R, Huang L, Liu P, Chen C.
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Dec; 121():108596. PubMed ID: 31623899
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Fetal weight estimation: comparison of two-dimensional US and MR imaging assessments.
    Kacem Y, Cannie MM, Kadji C, Dobrescu O, Lo Zito L, Ziane S, Strizek B, Evrard AS, Gubana F, Gucciardo L, Staelens R, Jani JC.
    Radiology; 2013 Jun; 267(3):902-10. PubMed ID: 23329652
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Prenatal prediction of postnatal large-for-dates neonates using a simplified MRI method: comparison with conventional 2D ultrasound estimates.
    Kadji C, Cannie MM, De Angelis R, Camus M, Klass M, Fellas S, Cecotti V, Dütemeyer V, Jani JC.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 52(2):250-257. PubMed ID: 28508549
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Repeatability of estimated fetal weight: Comparison between MR imaging versus 2D ultrasound in at- and near-term patients.
    Kadji C, Camus MF, Bevilacqua E, Cannie MM, Sanchez TC, Jani JC.
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Jun; 91():35-40. PubMed ID: 28629568
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of conventional 2D ultrasound to magnetic resonance imaging for prenatal estimation of birthweight in twin pregnancy.
    Kadji C, Bevilacqua E, Hurtado I, Carlin A, Cannie MM, Jani JC.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 218(1):128.e1-128.e11. PubMed ID: 29045850
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. 3D and 2D ultrasound-based fetal weight estimation: a single center experience.
    Mohsen LA, Amin MF.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Apr; 30(7):818-825. PubMed ID: 27160422
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. New nomogram for foetal weight estimation based on Hadlock's two-parameter formula.
    Beutler GM, Kurmanavicius J, Hoffmann M, Welzl E, Huch R, Bajka M.
    Ultraschall Med; 2004 Feb; 25(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 14961426
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Fetal weight estimation in gestational diabetic pregnancies: comparison between conventional and three-dimensional fractional thigh volume methods using gestation-adjusted projection.
    Pagani G, Palai N, Zatti S, Fratelli N, Prefumo F, Frusca T.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jan; 43(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 23494762
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Accuracy of ultrasound estimated fetal weight performed by residents at delivery day].
    Dimassi K, El Cadhi Y, Sahnoune R, Derbel M, Triki A, Ben Romdhane H, Gara F.
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2015 Sep; 44(7):632-8. PubMed ID: 25481768
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Three-Versus Two-Dimensional Sonographic Biometry for Predicting Birth Weight and Macrosomia in Diabetic Pregnancies.
    Tuuli MG, Kapalka K, Macones GA, Cahill AG.
    J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Sep; 35(9):1925-30. PubMed ID: 27466257
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Sonographic fetal weight estimation in prolonged pregnancy: comparative study of two- and three-dimensional methods.
    Lindell G, Marsál K.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 33(3):295-300. PubMed ID: 19180582
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Magnetic resonance imaging compared to ultrasonography in fetal weight and volume estimation in diabetic and normal pregnancy.
    Uotila J, Dastidar P, Heinonen T, Ryymin P, Punnonen R, Laasonen E.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2000 Apr; 79(4):255-9. PubMed ID: 10746838
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A validation study of ultrasonic foetal weight estimation models for Hong Kong Chinese singleton pregnancies.
    Pang MW, Leung TN, Lau TK.
    Hong Kong Med J; 2004 Dec; 10(6):384-8. PubMed ID: 15591596
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Fetal organ weight estimation by postmortem high-field magnetic resonance imaging before 20 weeks' gestation.
    Votino C, Verhoye M, Segers V, Cannie M, Bessieres B, Cos T, Lipombi D, Jani J.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jun; 39(6):673-8. PubMed ID: 22407748
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Accuracy of clinical and ultrasound estimation of fetal weight in predicting actual birth weight in Enugu, Southeastern Nigeria.
    Ugwu EO, Udealor PC, Dim CC, Obi SN, Ozumba BC, Okeke DO, Agu PU.
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2014 Jun; 17(3):270-5. PubMed ID: 24714001
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Good accuracy of ultrasound estimations of fetal weight performed by midwives.
    Mattsson N, Rosendahl H, Luukkaala T.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2007 Jun; 86(6):688-92. PubMed ID: 17520400
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.