These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

181 related items for PubMed ID: 30601763

  • 1. Let's talk about Reviewer Rewards.
    Jackson S.
    J Clin Invest; 2019 Feb 01; 129(2):439. PubMed ID: 30601763
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Peer-review and editorial process of the Ethiopian Medical Journal: ten years assessment of the status of submitted manuscripts.
    Enquselassie F.
    Ethiop Med J; 2013 Apr 01; 51(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 24079153
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Variability of Reviewers' Comments in the Peer Review Process for Orthopaedic Research.
    Iantorno SE, Andras LM, Skaggs DL.
    Spine Deform; 2016 Jul 01; 4(4):268-271. PubMed ID: 27927515
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The relationship between a reviewer's recommendation and editorial decision of manuscripts submitted for publication in obstetrics.
    Vintzileos AM, Ananth CV, Odibo AO, Chauhan SP, Smulian JC, Oyelese Y.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec 01; 211(6):703.e1-5. PubMed ID: 24983685
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Differences in review quality and recommendations for publication between peer reviewers suggested by authors or by editors.
    Schroter S, Tite L, Hutchings A, Black N.
    JAMA; 2006 Jan 18; 295(3):314-7. PubMed ID: 16418467
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The role of the manuscript reviewer in the peer review process.
    Polak JF.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Sep 18; 165(3):685-8. PubMed ID: 7645496
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. On publication of a manuscript: the author, the reviewer and the editor.
    Tonkin M.
    Hand Surg; 2013 Sep 18; 18(3):ix-x. PubMed ID: 24156598
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Getting Published: A Primer on Manuscript Writing and the Editorial Process.
    Fisher PG, Goodman DM, Long SS.
    J Pediatr; 2017 Jun 18; 185():241-244. PubMed ID: 28341526
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Blinded vs. unblinded peer review of manuscripts submitted to a dermatology journal: a randomized multi-rater study.
    Alam M, Kim NA, Havey J, Rademaker A, Ratner D, Tregre B, West DP, Coleman WP.
    Br J Dermatol; 2011 Sep 18; 165(3):563-7. PubMed ID: 21623749
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.