These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. DNA damage responses and their many interactions with the replication fork. Andreassen PR, Ho GP, D'Andrea AD. Carcinogenesis; 2006 May; 27(5):883-92. PubMed ID: 16490739 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. New mammalian cellular systems to study mutations introduced at the break site by non-homologous end-joining. Rebuzzini P, Khoriauli L, Azzalin CM, Magnani E, Mondello C, Giulotto E. DNA Repair (Amst); 2005 May 02; 4(5):546-55. PubMed ID: 15811627 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Using nucleases to stimulate homologous recombination. Carroll D. Methods Mol Biol; 2004 May 02; 262():195-207. PubMed ID: 14769963 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Mutations induced by 1-nitrosopyrene and related compounds during DNA replication in human cells and induction of homologous recombination by these compounds. Maher VM, Bhattacharyya NP, Mah MC, Boldt J, Yang JL, McCormick JJ. Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 1993 Mar 02; (55):1-40; discussion 41-51. PubMed ID: 8466678 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Non-homologous end joining is the responsible pathway for the repair of fludarabine-induced DNA double strand breaks in mammalian cells. de Campos-Nebel M, Larripa I, González-Cid M. Mutat Res; 2008 Nov 10; 646(1-2):8-16. PubMed ID: 18812179 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Roles of DNA polymerases in replication, repair, and recombination in eukaryotes. Pavlov YI, Shcherbakova PV, Rogozin IB. Int Rev Cytol; 2006 Nov 10; 255():41-132. PubMed ID: 17178465 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Chl1 and Ctf4 are required for damage-induced recombinations. Ogiwara H, Ui A, Lai MS, Enomoto T, Seki M. Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2007 Mar 02; 354(1):222-6. PubMed ID: 17222391 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Induction of chromosome damage by restriction enzymes during mitosis. Morgan WF, Valcarcel ER, Abella Columna E, Winegar RA, Yates BL. Radiat Res; 1991 Jul 02; 127(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 1648753 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Fragile site analysis: its significance in environmental mutagenesis. Ahuja YR. Prog Clin Biol Res; 1990 Jul 02; 340B():371-84. PubMed ID: 2203016 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [Two routes for the development of chromosome aberrations]. Mitrofanov IuA, Voskanian AZ. Genetika; 1976 Jul 02; 12(8):44-52. PubMed ID: 793934 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. [Alternative and non-alternative processes of the origin of chromosome aberrations]. Mitrofanov IuA, Lesnikova LN, Voskanian AZ, Otradnona VV. Radiobiologiia; 1991 Jul 02; 31(4):585-92. PubMed ID: 1947033 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. [A theoretical model of structural chromosome rearrangement induction]. Dutrillaux B. Ann Genet; 1977 Dec 02; 20(4):221-6. PubMed ID: 305747 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Sister chromatid exchange and chromatid interchange as possible manifestation of different DNA repair processes. Sasaki MS. Nature; 1977 Oct 13; 269(5629):623-5. PubMed ID: 917113 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. [DNA-topoisomerases and their functions in cell]. Giliarov DA, Shkundina IS. Mol Biol (Mosk); 2012 Oct 13; 46(1):52-63. PubMed ID: 22642101 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]